Accepted for/Published in: Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Date Submitted: Mar 2, 2023
Date Accepted: Jun 26, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Physiological Signal Analysis Techniques for Preterm Infants in Detecting Adverse Outcomes: A Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Computational signal pre-processing is a prerequisite for developing data-driven predictive models for clinical decision support. Thus, identifying the best practices that adhere to clinical principles is critical to ensure transparency and reproducibility which will drive clinical adoption.
Objective:
This review focuses on the Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting and summarises the state-of-the-art computational methods used for pre-processing neonatal clinical physiological signals for the development of machine learning models in predicting the risk of adverse outcomes.
Methods:
Five databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE, ACM Digital Library) were searched using a combination of keywords and MeSH terms. 3,585 papers from the year 2013 to January 2023 were identified based on the defined search terms and inclusion criteria. After removing duplicates, 2,994 papers were screened by title and abstract, and 81 were selected for full-text review. Of these, 52 were eligible for inclusion in the detailed analysis.
Results:
The papers included in the review were heterogeneous in design and the selection of adverse outcomes modelled. We found a partial or complete lack of transparency in reporting the setting and the methods used for signal pre-processing. This includes reporting methods to handle missing data, segment size for considered analysis, and details regarding the modification of the state-of-the-art methods for physiological signal processing to align with the clinical principles for neonates.
Conclusions:
The review found heterogeneity in techniques and inconsistent reporting of parameters and procedures used for pre-processing neonatal physiological signals, which is necessary to confirm their adherence to clinical practices, usefulness and choice of the best practices. Improving this aspect will ensure transparent reporting and hence facilitate the interpretation and reproducibility of the studies as well as accelerate their clinical adoption. Clinical Trial: N/A
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.