Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 3, 2023
Date Accepted: Jun 26, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

User Experiences of Transitioning From a Homegrown Electronic Health Record to a Vendor-Based Product in the Department of Veterans Affairs: Qualitative Findings From a Mixed Methods Evaluation

Anderson E, Moldestad M, Brunner J, Ball S, Helfrich C, Orlander J, Rinne S, Sayre G

User Experiences of Transitioning From a Homegrown Electronic Health Record to a Vendor-Based Product in the Department of Veterans Affairs: Qualitative Findings From a Mixed Methods Evaluation

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e46901

DOI: 10.2196/46901

PMID: 39255006

PMCID: 11422731

Transitioning from a homegrown electronic health record to a vendor-based product: A qualitative evaluation of end-user experiences from VA’s first EHR transition site

  • Ekaterina Anderson; 
  • Megan Moldestad; 
  • Julian Brunner; 
  • Sherry Ball; 
  • Christian Helfrich; 
  • Jay Orlander; 
  • Seppo Rinne; 
  • George Sayre

ABSTRACT

Background:

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the largest nationally integrated health system in the United States, is transitioning from its homegrown electronic health record (EHR) to a new vendor-based Oracle Cerner EHR. Experiences of the first VA site to transition have been widely discussed in the media, but in-depth accounts based on rigorous research are lacking.

Objective:

We sought to fill this gap by exploring the shifting employee perspectives on the rationale for and value of transitioning from an EHR that was highly tailored to VA’s needs to a vendor-based product that appears to be significantly less so.

Methods:

As part of a larger mixed-methods, multi-site formative evaluation of VA clinician and staff experiences with the EHR transition, we conducted semi-structured interviews at the Mann-Grandstaff VA Medical Center (MGVAMC) before, during, and after “go-live” in October 2020. In total, we completed 122 interviews with 26 participants across multiple departments.

Results:

Prior to the new EHR going-live, participants initially expressed cautious optimism about the transition. However, in subsequent interviews following go-live participants increasingly critiqued the vendor’s understanding of VA’s needs, values, and workflows, as well as what they perceived as an inadequate fit between the functionalities of the new EHR system and VA’s characteristic approach to care. As much as a year after go-live, participants reiterated these concerns, while also expressing a desire for substantive changes to the transition process, with some questioning the value of continuing with the transition.

Conclusions:

VA’s transition from a homegrown EHR to a vendor-based EHR system has presented significant challenges both practical and cultural in nature. As such, it is a valuable case study for understanding the sociotechnical dimension of EHR-to-EHR transitions. These findings have implications for both VA leadership and the broader community of policymakers, vendors, informaticists, and others involved in large-scale health information technology implementations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Anderson E, Moldestad M, Brunner J, Ball S, Helfrich C, Orlander J, Rinne S, Sayre G

User Experiences of Transitioning From a Homegrown Electronic Health Record to a Vendor-Based Product in the Department of Veterans Affairs: Qualitative Findings From a Mixed Methods Evaluation

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e46901

DOI: 10.2196/46901

PMID: 39255006

PMCID: 11422731

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.