Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Feb 28, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 28, 2023 - Apr 25, 2023
Date Accepted: May 14, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Attitudes Toward the Adoption of two AI-Enabled Mental Health Tools Among Prospective Psychotherapists: A Cross-Sectional Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
An investigation of individual-level predictors of the intention to use an AI-enabled feedback and a treatment recommendation tool in mental healthcare.
Objective:
Using an extended UTAUT model to gain insight into the predictors of technology usage intentions fortwo specific AI-enabled mental healthcare tools.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study included 206 psychology students and psychotherapists-in-training to examine the predictors of their intention to use two AI-enabled mental healthcare tools. The first tool provides feedback to the psychotherapist on their adherence to motivational interviewing techniques. The second tool uses patient voice samples to derive mood scores that the therapist may use for treatment decisions. Participants were presented with graphic depictions of the tools’ functioning mechanisms before measuring the variables of an extended UTAUT. Two structural equation models (one for each tool) were specified that included direct and mediated paths predicting tool usage intentions.
Results:
Perceived usefulness and social influence had a positive effect on the intention to use both tools. However, trust was unrelated to usage intention for both tools. Moreover, perceived ease of use was unrelated (feedback tool) and even negatively related (treatment recommendation tool) to usage intentions when considering all predictors. In addition, a direct relationship between cognitive technology readiness and the intention to use the feedback tool, and a negative relationship between AI anxiety and usage intentions were observed.
Conclusions:
The results shed light on general and tool-dependent drivers of AI technology adoption in mental healthcare. Future research may explore technological and user group characteristics that influence the adoption of AI-enabled tools in mental healthcare. Clinical Trial: The hypotheses were pre-registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fqdzb). Exploratory hypotheses are identified as such.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.