Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Feb 23, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 7, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study

Peven K, Wickham A, Wilks O, Kaplan YC, Marhol A, Ahmed S, Bamford R, Prentice C, Meczner A, Fenech M, Gilbert S, Klepchukova A, Ponzo S

Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023;11:e46718

DOI: 10.2196/46718

PMID: 38051574

PMCID: 10731551

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Assessing the accuracy of a digital symptom checker tool for suggestion of reproductive health conditions: a clinical vignettes study

  • Kimberly Peven; 
  • Aidan Wickham; 
  • Octavia Wilks; 
  • Yusuf C. Kaplan; 
  • Andrei Marhol; 
  • Saddif Ahmed; 
  • Ryan Bamford; 
  • Carley Prentice; 
  • AndrĂ¡s Meczner; 
  • Matthew Fenech; 
  • Stephen Gilbert; 
  • Anna Klepchukova; 
  • Sonia Ponzo

ABSTRACT

Background:

Reproductive health conditions such as endometriosis, uterine fibroids and polycystic ovary syndrome affect a large proportion of women and people who menstruate worldwide. Prevalence estimates for these conditions range from 5-40% of women of reproductive age. Long diagnostic delays, up to 12 years, are common and contribute to health complications and increased healthcare costs. Symptom checker apps provide users with information and tools to better understand their symptoms and thus have the potential to reduce the time to diagnosis for reproductive health conditions.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of three symptom checkers developed by Flo Health assessing symptoms of endometriosis, uterine fibroids and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) against current medical guidelines.

Methods:

Independent general practitioners were recruited to create clinical case vignettes of simulated users with and without the conditions of interest. Vignettes were reviewed, modified and approved by separate general practitioners. A further independent panel of general practitioners reviewed the cases and designated a final classification. Vignettes were entered into the symptom checkers and the outcomes were compared with the final classification from the panel using accuracy metrics including percent agreement, sensitivity and specificity.

Results:

A total of 24 cases were created per condition. Overall, exact matches between the vignette classification and the symptom checker outcome was 83.3% for endometriosis and uterine fibroids, and 87.5% for PCOS. While sensitivity was high for all conditions (>81%) and very high (100%) for PCOS, specificity was >81% for endometriosis and uterine fibroids and 75% for PCOS.

Conclusions:

The single condition symptom checkers have high levels of accuracy for endometriosis, uterine fibroids and PCOS. Given long delays in diagnosis for many reproductive health conditions, which lead to increased medical costs and potential health complications for individuals and healthcare providers, innovative health apps and symptom checkers hold the potential to improve care pathways.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Peven K, Wickham A, Wilks O, Kaplan YC, Marhol A, Ahmed S, Bamford R, Prentice C, Meczner A, Fenech M, Gilbert S, Klepchukova A, Ponzo S

Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023;11:e46718

DOI: 10.2196/46718

PMID: 38051574

PMCID: 10731551

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.