Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 22, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 20, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Digitization of Follow-Up Care in Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery With Video Consultations: Health Economic Evaluation Study From a Health Provider’s Perspective

Muschol J, Heinrich M, Heiss C, Hernandez AM, Knapp G, Repp H, Schneider H, Thormann U, Uhlar J, Unzeitig K, Gissel C

Digitization of Follow-Up Care in Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery With Video Consultations: Health Economic Evaluation Study From a Health Provider’s Perspective

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e46714

DOI: 10.2196/46714

PMID: 38145481

PMCID: 10775022

Digitization of Follow-up Care in Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery with Video Consultations: Health Economic Evaluation from a Health Provider’s Perspective

  • Jennifer Muschol; 
  • Martin Heinrich; 
  • Christian Heiss; 
  • Alher Mauricio Hernandez; 
  • Gero Knapp; 
  • Holger Repp; 
  • Henning Schneider; 
  • Ulrich Thormann; 
  • Johanna Uhlar; 
  • Kai Unzeitig; 
  • Christian Gissel

ABSTRACT

Background:

Recommendations for healthcare digitization as issued with the Riyadh Declaration led to an uptake in telemedicine and teleconsultations to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic. Evaluations based on clinical data are needed to support stakeholders’ decision-making on the long-term implementation of digital health.

Objective:

This health economic evaluation aims to analyze the suitability of video consultations for the follow-up care of orthopedic and trauma surgery patients from a health provider's perspective and to investigate the financial and personnel impact associated with telemedicine to provide a basis for stakeholders’ decisions.

Methods:

The study was based on data from a randomized controlled trial that evaluated video consultations versus face-to-face consultations. The suitability of telemedicine was assessed by the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. In addition, various model calculations regarding the impact of telemedicine on personnel costs and clinic capacities as well as the break-even point of video consultations were conducted.

Results:

77% of all patients agreed that telemedicine provided for their healthcare needs and no significant difference was found in the change of patient utility between groups after three months (mean 0.02 vs. mean 0.07, P=0.347). The use of telemedicine, however, saved 25% in personnel costs and increased the number of treatable patients. 23 video consultations per month were required to recoup the software fees of telemedicine through reduced personnel costs for a senior physician.

Conclusions:

Telemedicine is less time-consuming for physicians compared to face-to-face consultations. Properly implemented, telemedicine can result in cost savings and productivity gains for clinics with no negative impact on patient utility. Clinical Trial: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00023445; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00023445


 Citation

Please cite as:

Muschol J, Heinrich M, Heiss C, Hernandez AM, Knapp G, Repp H, Schneider H, Thormann U, Uhlar J, Unzeitig K, Gissel C

Digitization of Follow-Up Care in Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery With Video Consultations: Health Economic Evaluation Study From a Health Provider’s Perspective

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e46714

DOI: 10.2196/46714

PMID: 38145481

PMCID: 10775022

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.