Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Feb 17, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 16, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

An Active Model of Research Translation for the General Public: Content Analysis of a YouTube-Based Health Podcast

Tsulukidze M, Grande SW, Naslund JA

An Active Model of Research Translation for the General Public: Content Analysis of a YouTube-Based Health Podcast

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e46611

DOI: 10.2196/46611

PMID: 38051560

PMCID: 10731552

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Active Model of Research Translation: Engaging end users via online platform

  • Maka Tsulukidze; 
  • Stuart W Grande; 
  • John A Naslund

ABSTRACT

Online health information seeking is changing the way people engage the health system. We sought to examine an innovative model of research translation, The Huberman Lab Podcast (HLP), developed by Andrew Huberman, Professor of Neurobiology and Ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine. HLP leverages social media to deliver health information translated into specific, actionable practices and health strategies directly to consumers. This research aims to characterize the HLP as a model of research translation and assess its potential for wider adoption and application. We applied two distinct qualitative analytical approaches: conventional content analysis of the YouTube transcript data and directed content analysis of viewers’ YouTube comments to 23 HLP episodes released by the time of data analysis. Key features of the HLP model include direct to consumer, zero cost, bilingual, and actionable content. We identified three main organizing categories and ten subcategories as the key elements of the model: 1) Why: Educate and empower; Bring zero cost to consumer information to the general public; 2) What: Tools and Protocols; Underlying mechanisms; Grounded in Science; 3) How: Linear and Iterative Knowledge Building Process; Lecture-Style Sessions; Interactive and Consumer Informed; Easily Accessible; Building the Community. Analysis of viewers’ comments found strong consumer support of the key HLP model elements. The HLP model of research translation, designed as an interactive and user-informed online product, offers an innovative way to synthesize scientific evidence and deliver it directly to end-users as actionable tools and education. The model offers a replicable framework for translating and disseminating scientific evidence. Similar active models of research translation may have meaningful implications for improving access to health information and the implementation of health strategies for improved outcomes. Additional areas for further investigation should include specific, measurable impacts on health, usability and relevance of the model for disadvantaged and high-risk populations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tsulukidze M, Grande SW, Naslund JA

An Active Model of Research Translation for the General Public: Content Analysis of a YouTube-Based Health Podcast

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e46611

DOI: 10.2196/46611

PMID: 38051560

PMCID: 10731552

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.