Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Feb 16, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 16, 2023 - Apr 13, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 27, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

From the Cochrane Library: Systemic Interventions for Steven-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN Overlap Syndrome

Pathak GN, Truong TM, Singal A, Taranto V, Rao B, Jacobsen AA

From the Cochrane Library: Systemic Interventions for Steven-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN Overlap Syndrome

JMIR Dermatol 2024;7:e46580

DOI: 10.2196/46580

PMID: 38289652

PMCID: 10865192

From the Cochrane Library: Systemic interventions for SJS, TEN, and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome

  • Gaurav Nitin Pathak; 
  • Thu Minh Truong; 
  • Amit Singal; 
  • Viktoria Taranto; 
  • Babar Rao; 
  • Audrey A. Jacobsen

ABSTRACT

Steven-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome are a spectrum of life-threatening conditions characterized by sloughing of the skin and epidermal necrosis. SJS/TEN generally occurs after initiation of a new medication and lead to infection, electrolyte imbalances, multi-organ failure and death. Despite the mortality risk, there is a lack of consensus in the acute management of SJS/TEN, with systemic interventions and supportive measures being the general course of treatment. This manuscript aims to summarize the key findings from the original Cochrane systematic review of interventions for treatment of SJS, TEN and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome. To evaluate the systemic therapies for SJS/TEN, a systematic review of clinical trials and prospective observational comparative studies of SJS/TEN was conducted. The primary endpoint was disease specific mortality (DSM) and adverse events (AE's) leading to discontinuation of the systemic treatment therapy. Secondary endpoints included time to complete re-epithelialization, intensive care unit length of stay, total hospital length of stay, illness sequelae, and AE's. Key comparator studies across different treatment options were also included to highlight the optimal agent for SJS/TEN treatment. Nine total studies were identified and included in the systematic review. Systemic corticosteroids had a higher risk of DSM compared to other therapeutic agents. Corticosteroids and IVIG compared to IVIG alone showed no difference in risk of DSM, time to re-epithelialization, and length of stay. The patients receiving etanercept were 49% less likely to have DSM compared to prednisolone. Serious adverse events (SAE's) such as sepsis and respiratory failure occurred with etanercept and corticosteroids, but it was unclear whether these AE’s led to treatment discontinuation. In the cyclosporine versus IVIG comparator group, it was uncertain if there was a difference in mortality. Future studies including larger clinical trials are needed to evaluate direct comparisons between different treatment agents to optimize agent selection for SJS/TEN management.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pathak GN, Truong TM, Singal A, Taranto V, Rao B, Jacobsen AA

From the Cochrane Library: Systemic Interventions for Steven-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN Overlap Syndrome

JMIR Dermatol 2024;7:e46580

DOI: 10.2196/46580

PMID: 38289652

PMCID: 10865192

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.