Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Client and clinician experiences and perspectives of exercise physiology services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study
Riley C.C. Brown;
Shelley E. Keating;
Patrick J. Owen;
Paul Jansons;
Jenna McVicar;
Christopher D Askew;
Kelly M Clanchy;
Ralph Maddison;
Andrew Maiorana;
Suzanne Robinson;
Niamh L Mundell
ABSTRACT
Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in the delivery of exercise physiology services. The lived experience of those who continued to provide or receive exercise physiology services during the heightened public health restrictions of the inaugural year of the COVID-19 pandemic has received little attention to date, limiting advances in service delivery.
Objective:
We aimed to explore the clinician and client experiences and perspectives of exercise physiology services delivered in-person and/or via telehealth during the inaugural year of the COVID-19 pandemic (after 25 January 2020; date of first confirmed case in Australia).
Methods:
Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with accredited exercise physiologists (n=7) and clients (n=11) who engaged with exercise physiology services during this period. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded and analysed using thematic content analysis.
Results:
Three dominant themes, each with two sub-themes, were identified: (1) telehealth enables access to services but limited the use of some clinical tools; (2) engagement and the ‘relational space’ are limited by telehealth; (3) technological challenges are pervasive in telehealth delivery of exercise services. Despite pervasive technological challenges, telehealth enabled access to exercise physiology services. However, clinician-client rapport, social engagement and the capacity to utilise dedicated equipment for exercise prescription and outcome assessment were viewed as negatives to telehealth service delivery.
Conclusions:
Shared client and accredited exercise physiologist experiences highlight key considerations for the ongoing implementation of telehealth to facilitate the uptake and effectiveness of exercise physiology services. Clinical Trial: Deakin University Human Ethics Advisory Group – Health (90-2020-200512)
Citation
Please cite as:
Brown RC, Keating SE, Owen PJ, Jansons P, McVicar J, Askew CD, Clanchy KM, Maddison R, Maiorana A, Robinson S, Mundell NL
Client and Clinician Experiences and Perspectives of Exercise Physiology Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study