Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Mar 22, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 27, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Parental Attitudes on Social Media Monitoring for Youth: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Cohen A, Bendelow A, Smith T, Cicchetti C, Davis MM, Heffernan M

Parental Attitudes on Social Media Monitoring for Youth: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2023;6:e46365

DOI: 10.2196/46365

PMID: 37976085

PMCID: 10670659

Parental Attitudes on Social Media Monitoring for Youth: Results from a Cross-Sectional Survey

  • Alyssa Cohen; 
  • Anne Bendelow; 
  • Tracie Smith; 
  • Colleen Cicchetti; 
  • Matthew M. Davis; 
  • Marie Heffernan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Online environments dominate the daily lives of American youth and pose evolving challenges to their health and well-being. Recent national poll data indicate that social media overuse, internet safety, and online bullying are among parents’ top child health concerns, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. While parents are uniquely positioned to help youth navigate social media, their attitudes on monitoring media use may be impacted by a myriad of personal and family factors.

Objective:

To examine factors associated with parental attitudes about monitoring youth social media.

Methods:

Data were analyzed from the Voices of Child Health in Chicago Parent Panel Survey, administered to parents online and by telephone. Parents with at least one child ≥11 years old responded to questions about bullying and social media monitoring in May-July 2020. The primary outcome was response to: “Do you think parents should monitor their children’s use of social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram?”. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression were used to examine parental agreement with frequent social media monitoring and concerns about bullying, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Analyses were weighted to represent the parent population of Chicago.

Results:

Among 1,613 survey respondents, the analyzed sample included 808 parents with at least one child ≥11 years old. Overall, 62.9% of parents agreed with frequent monitoring of their children’s social media use. Compared with parents ≤35 years old, parents >35 were significantly less likely to agree with frequent social media monitoring (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.25-0.81). Parents expressing a high level of concern regarding the effects of bullying were more likely to agree with frequent monitoring of youth social media (aOR 2.15, 95%CI 1.24-3.73).

Conclusions:

Parents’ personal characteristics and concerns about bullying may influence their attitudes toward monitoring youth social media. Given the potential impact of these attitudes on parental monitoring behaviors and subsequent youth health impact, pediatricians should consider these factors when counseling about bullying and social media. Child health professionals can support families in developing a safe media use plan that fits family circumstances.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Cohen A, Bendelow A, Smith T, Cicchetti C, Davis MM, Heffernan M

Parental Attitudes on Social Media Monitoring for Youth: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2023;6:e46365

DOI: 10.2196/46365

PMID: 37976085

PMCID: 10670659

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.