Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education
Date Submitted: Jan 31, 2023
Date Accepted: Sep 28, 2023
Preliminary Evaluation of an International Online Journal Club for Ketamine in Psychiatric Disorders: A Cross-sectional Survey Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
The use of novel rapid-acting antidepressants like ketamine for psychiatric disorders is expanding, and knowledge sharing and community building in this field are essential. The online ketamine and related compounds international journal club (KIJC) was created by a UK group of academic clinicians and psychiatry trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Attendance was voluntary, extracurricular, and free. Meetings were held twice per month to discuss articles related only to the use of ketamine for the treatment of mental health conditions. A website, email, and word of mouth were used for recruitment. The meetings were conducted live using video conferencing software in three parts: a 20-minute presentation, a 15-minute chaired question and answer session, and a 25-minute informal discussion with attendees' cameras on. The first two parts were recorded and uploaded to the KIJC website alongside corresponding publications.
Objective:
A preliminary evaluation of the online international journal club’s satisfaction and impact after the first year of the KIJC. The journal club aimed to facilitate bidirectional discussions, the sharing of ideas, and networking between clinical and academic professionals.
Methods:
Two anonymous online cross-sectional surveys were conducted using the web tool SurveyMonkey from November 2021 to February 2022, one for speakers and another for audience members, separately. Various survey statements, 14 for speakers and 12 for the audience, were categorized according to format satisfaction, format impact, obtaining participants’ primary career roles, and requesting optional written feedback. Responses were compared between both groups and analysed. There were 24 meetings in the first year, with a mean of 51 (standard deviation (SD) ± 20) audience members attending each session live and a mean of 63 (SD±50) views of each subsequent recording. Twenty-four speakers from 8 countries presented their most recent ketamine publications to an international audience of professionals, typically within 2 months of publication. An inductive thematic analysis was performed and lessons learned from designing the journal club format were summarised.
Results:
A total of thirty survey responses (n=30) were obtained, demonstrating overall agreement with statements. Twelve of 24 speakers (50%) and 18 of 51 (SD±20) average audience members (35%) regarded the journal club's format and design as impactful and satisfying. Many survey statements indicated similar levels of agreement between both groups. The majority of respondents identified as clinicians, researchers, and clinician-researchers. Additionally, 11 respondents (37%) also provided optional written feedback, from 3 speakers (10%) and 8 audience members (27%). From the feedback five main themes were derived: engagement with the journal club, desire for active participation, improving the platform, positive learning experiences, and suggestions for future sessions.
Conclusions:
The journal club successfully reached its intended audience and developed into an online community. The majority of participants were satisfied with the format and found it impactful. Overall, the journal club appears to be a valuable tool for knowledge sharing and community building in the field of ketamine therapy for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. A larger sample size and additional testing methods are required to support the generalisability of the journal club's format.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.