Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jan 28, 2023
Date Accepted: Jun 27, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient and Public Acceptance of Digital Technologies in Health Care: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment

Fischer AK, Mühlbacher A

Patient and Public Acceptance of Digital Technologies in Health Care: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment

JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e46056

DOI: 10.2196/46056

PMID: 37561559

PMCID: 10450540

Patient and public acceptance to valuing digital technologies in healthcare: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment

  • Ann-Kathrin Fischer; 
  • Axel Mühlbacher

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital technologies are increasingly used to meet patients’ unfilled needs on their patient journey. Patients must be adherent with the unfamiliar digital intervention to achieve their goals. Therefore, Acceptance is a key factor for implementing innovations. We will investigate the acceptance of digital technologies in health care with a focus on stroke rehabilitation.

Objective:

This paper describes the methodology and development of an ongoing health preference research study. This study aims to elicit patients' and public preferences of digital technologies in health care to analyze the impact on acceptance and understand the value of digital interventions.

Methods:

To obtain information on criteria impacting acceptance, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) will be conducted including 7 attributes based on formative qualitative research. Stroke patients (experimental) and general population (control) are surveyed. The study populations are (1) stroke patients (experimental group) and (2) the general population (control group). The final instrument includes six best-second-best tasks in partial design. The experimental design is a fractional-factorial efficient Bayesian design (D-error). A conditional logit regression model and mixed logistic regression models will be used for analysis. To consider the heterogeneity of subgroups, a latent class analysis and analysis on heteroskadasticity will be performed.

Results:

The literature review, the qualitative preliminary study, survey development and pretesting were completed. Data collection and analysis will be completed in the last quarter of 2023.

Conclusions:

This health preference research study provides information on preferences to analyze criteria impacting acceptance and the value of innovative interventions using digital technologies. Developers, health care provider and policy makers often make difficult decisions about development, reimbursement, and the choice on the benefit-maximizing intervention for each patient (group). Therefore, we aim to inform decision-makers to support a patient-centric health care system. Clinical Trial: Ethics and dissemination: The preference survey instruments, the informed consent form, and the study design were reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Hochschule Neubrandenburg (HSNB/177/21).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fischer AK, Mühlbacher A

Patient and Public Acceptance of Digital Technologies in Health Care: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment

JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e46056

DOI: 10.2196/46056

PMID: 37561559

PMCID: 10450540

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.