Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Date Submitted: Jan 27, 2023
Date Accepted: Jul 19, 2023
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Usability, acceptability and adoption of a self-directed technology-based intervention for upper limb rehabilitation amongst stroke survivors
ABSTRACT
Background:
Upper Limb (UL) recovery after stroke is strongly dependent upon rehabilitation dose; rehabilitation technologies present pragmatic solutions to dose enhancement. To date, technologies promoting self-directed rehabilitation have been poorly adopted. Understanding the barriers to adoption may shape strategies to enhance technology use, and therefore increase rehabilitation dose.
Objective:
We investigated how stroke survivor characteristics, technology usability, and attitudes towards technology (acceptability) influence engagement with rehabilitation technology.
Methods:
We conducted a feasibility study of a novel exercise-gaming technology for self-directed UL rehabilitation in subacute stroke survivors (within 30 days of stroke) (n=30) in an inpatient, acute hospital setting. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, participants’ performance in using the system (usability) was assessed using a 4-point performance rating scale (adapted from the Barthel Index) and adherence with the system was logged throughout the trial. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989) was used to formulate a survey examining the acceptability of the system. Spearman’s rank correlations were used to examine associations between participant characteristics, user performance (usability), end-point technology acceptance and intervention adherence (adoption). Hierarchical cluster analysis characterised the structural organisation of the predictor-outcome similarity matrix.
Results:
The technology was usable for 87% of participants and the overall technology acceptance rating was 68% (95% CI: 56-79%). Participants trained with the device for a median of 26 minutes daily (IQR: 16-31), over an enrolment period of 8 days (IQR: 5-14). Technology adoption positively correlated with user performance (usability)(ρ: 0.55, 95% CI: [0.23, 0.75], P=.007) and acceptability: domains of perceived usefulness (ρ 0.42, 95%CI:[ 0.09, 0.68] P=0.03) and perceived ease of use (ρ: 0.46, 95% CI: [ 0.10, 0.74] P= 0.02). Technology acceptance decreased with increased global stroke severity (ρ: -0.56, 95% CI: [-0.79,-0.22] P= 0.007). A cluster analysis found that adoption was most closely linked with (in order of strength): usability; female sex; functional independence and UL impairment severity; prior technology exposure and cognition; perceptions of usefulness and ease of use.
Conclusions:
Technology usability and acceptability were determinants of adoption and appear to be mediated by stroke survivor characteristics. The results demonstrate the importance of selecting technologies for stroke survivors on basis of individual needs and abilities and optimising the accessibility of technologies for the target user group. Facilitating changes in stroke survivors’ beliefs and attitudes towards rehabilitation technologies may enhance adoption.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.