Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jan 24, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 23, 2023 - Mar 20, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 13, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mental Distress, Label Avoidance, and Use of a Mental Health Chatbot: Results From a US Survey

Kosyluk K, Baeder T, Greene KY, Tran JT, Bolton C, Loecher N, DiEva D, Galea J

Mental Distress, Label Avoidance, and Use of a Mental Health Chatbot: Results From a US Survey

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e45959

DOI: 10.2196/45959

PMID: 38607665

PMCID: 11053397

Mental Distress, Label Avoidance, and Use of a Mental Health Chatbot: Results from a U.S. Survey

  • Kristin Kosyluk; 
  • Tanner Baeder; 
  • Karah Yeona Greene; 
  • Jennifer T. Tran; 
  • Cassidy Bolton; 
  • Nele Loecher; 
  • Daniel DiEva; 
  • Jerome Galea

ABSTRACT

Background:

Behavioral health provider supply has not kept pace with demand. Simply training more professionals will not be enough to address the strain on the U.S. behavioral healthcare workforce and exacerbated behavioral health challenges among U.S. adults due to COVID-19.

Objective:

Our objective was to pilot test a mental health chatbot designed to screen users for psychological distress and refer to resources.

Methods:

Data were collected via a national, cross-sectional, internet-based survey of U.S. adults. Measures included demographics, symptoms, stigma, technology acceptance, willingness to use the chatbot, and chatbot acceptability. Relationships between these variables were explored using chi-square tests, correlations, and logistic regression.

Results:

Of 222 participants, 75.7% completed mental health screening within the chatbot. Participants found the chatbot to be acceptable. Demographic predictors of chatbot use included being White or Black/African American, identifying as Hispanic/Latino, having dependents, having insurance coverage, having used mental health services in the past, having a diagnosed mental health condition, and reporting current distress. Logistic regression produced a significant model with perceived usefulness and symptoms as significant positive predictors of chatbot use for the overall sample, and label avoidance as the only significant predictor of chatbot use for those currently experiencing distress.

Conclusions:

Chatbot technology may be a feasible and acceptable way to screen large numbers of people for psychological distress and disseminate mental health resources. Since label avoidance was identified as the single significant predictor of chatbot use among currently distressed individuals, chatbot technology may be one way to circumnavigate stigma as a barrier to engagement in behavioral health care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kosyluk K, Baeder T, Greene KY, Tran JT, Bolton C, Loecher N, DiEva D, Galea J

Mental Distress, Label Avoidance, and Use of a Mental Health Chatbot: Results From a US Survey

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e45959

DOI: 10.2196/45959

PMID: 38607665

PMCID: 11053397

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.