Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jan 16, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 15, 2023 - Mar 12, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 19, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Implementation and Impact of Federated Digital Identifiers (FDIs) in Healthcare: An Environmental Scan
ABSTRACT
Background:
Federated digital identifiers (FDI) have been cited to improve the interoperability of data and improve information management while enhancing privacy of individuals verifying their identity online. FDIs could improve the experience of accessing healthcare, but they have only been introduced in a few jurisdictions and their impact remains unclear.
Objective:
The main objectives of this environmental scan was to describe how FDIs have been established and implemented within healthcare.
Methods:
We conducted an environmental scan consisting of an academic and grey literature search. The academic literature review was conducted through a database search of MEDLINE and EMBASE which generated a list of countries and their services that use FDIs within healthcare. This list was then used to conduct a targeted grey literature search using the Google search engine.
Results:
A total of 93 references from database and targeted Google searches were included in the environmental scan. FDIs were implemented in healthcare in 11 countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, and Taiwan) and almost exclusively used with a Patient Accessible Electronic Health Record system via a single sign-on interface. The most common FDIs were implemented nationally or provincially and establishing them usually required an in-person visit to a bank or government office. FDIs in healthcare can facilitate the amalgamation of health information from different data sources into one platform. Despite this, the adoption of most healthcare services that use FDIs remained below 30%.
Conclusions:
This environmental scan highlights key features of FDIs across regions, and elements associated with higher adoption in a few countries, like opt-out registration. Although FDIs have been reported to facilitate the collation of data from multiple sources via a single sign-on interface, there is little information on their impact on patient experience. If FDIs are used to their fullest potential and implemented across sectors adoption rates within healthcare may also improve.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.