Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 16, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 15, 2023 - Mar 12, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 19, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review

Ramamoorthi K, Stamenova V, Liu RH, Bhattacharyya O

The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e45751

DOI: 10.2196/45751

PMID: 38329799

PMCID: 10884916

The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers (FDIs) in Healthcare: A Rapid Review

  • Karishini Ramamoorthi; 
  • Vess Stamenova; 
  • Rebecca H. Liu; 
  • Onil Bhattacharyya

ABSTRACT

Background:

Federated digital identifiers (FDI) have been cited to improve the interoperability of data and improve information management while enhancing privacy of individuals verifying their identity online. FDIs could improve the experience of accessing healthcare, but they have only been introduced in a few jurisdictions and their impact remains unclear.

Objective:

The main objectives of this environmental scan was to describe how FDIs have been established and implemented within healthcare.

Methods:

We conducted an environmental scan consisting of an academic and grey literature search. The academic literature review was conducted through a database search of MEDLINE and EMBASE which generated a list of countries and their services that use FDIs within healthcare. This list was then used to conduct a targeted grey literature search using the Google search engine.

Results:

A total of 93 references from database and targeted Google searches were included in the environmental scan. FDIs were implemented in healthcare in 11 countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, and Taiwan) and almost exclusively used with a Patient Accessible Electronic Health Record system via a single sign-on interface. The most common FDIs were implemented nationally or provincially and establishing them usually required an in-person visit to a bank or government office. FDIs in healthcare can facilitate the amalgamation of health information from different data sources into one platform. Despite this, the adoption of most healthcare services that use FDIs remained below 30%.

Conclusions:

This environmental scan highlights key features of FDIs across regions, and elements associated with higher adoption in a few countries, like opt-out registration. Although FDIs have been reported to facilitate the collation of data from multiple sources via a single sign-on interface, there is little information on their impact on patient experience. If FDIs are used to their fullest potential and implemented across sectors adoption rates within healthcare may also improve.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ramamoorthi K, Stamenova V, Liu RH, Bhattacharyya O

The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e45751

DOI: 10.2196/45751

PMID: 38329799

PMCID: 10884916

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.