Previously submitted to: JMIR Mental Health (no longer under consideration since Jan 09, 2023)
Date Submitted: Jan 9, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 9, 2023 - Jan 9, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Longitudinal insights in psychosocial stress expressed by health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic – a mixed-method approach
ABSTRACT
Background:
COVID-19 has affected everyday life and working conditions for most European people, particularly health care professionals (HCP). The worsening of mental health, work-related stressors, and helpful coping strategies within HCP have been studied by various quantitative surveys for all waves of infection. Longitudinal comparisons of stressors and coping as well as the themes that are particularly stressful for the HCP on different levels of experience at distinct timepoints of the pandemic are missing.
Objective:
Analyzing stressors, coping strategies, and underlying psychosocial stress factors and unmet needs expressed by HCP and non-medical staff at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and the third wave of infections in different European countries.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey was conducted in two study periods during COVID-19 pandemic in different European countries. The first study period was between April 1st and June 20th 2020 and the second between the November 25th 2021 and February 28th 2022. Quantitative descriptive analysis was conducted for questionnaires on stressors and coping strategies. Thematic analysis was used to complement the quantitative data with the results of the qualitative data to explore further levels of experience of the individual.
Results:
The most severe stressors identified at both timepoints were the uncertainty about when the pandemic will be under control and the fear of infecting the family. Commonly used coping strategies were the use of protective measures and the collection of information on COVID-19. A thematic analysis revealed 8 first level themes (pandemic situation, government/politics, social climate, measures, working conditions, infection effects, daily life, coping) which can be seen as levels of experience. During the beginning of the pandemic, comments focused on needs regarding protective equipment and handling the social-distancing situation, while unmet psychosocial needs came up only in the second study period.
Conclusions:
Over the course of three years of the pandemic, there is still a need in the psychosocial pandemic preparedness of health care professionals that deserves further research and coverage. Despite many government and work-related measures, a deterioration of mental health in HCP, could be observed. It is important for future crises to cover the gaps in psychosocial support needs revealed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, an improvement in pandemic preparedness and a mentally healthier population must be ensured in the future.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.