Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 6, 2023
Date Accepted: May 18, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating the Supporting Evidence of Medical Cannabis Claims Made on Clinic Websites: Cross-Sectional Study

O'Neill B, Ferguson J, Dalueg L, Yusuf A, Kirubarajan A, Lloyd T, Mollanji E, Persaud N

Evaluating the Supporting Evidence of Medical Cannabis Claims Made on Clinic Websites: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e45550

DOI: 10.2196/45550

PMID: 37384372

PMCID: 10365571

Evaluating the supporting evidence of medical cannabis claims made on Ontario, Canada clinic websites: a cross-sectional study

  • Braden O'Neill; 
  • Jacob Ferguson; 
  • Lauren Dalueg; 
  • Abban Yusuf; 
  • Abirami Kirubarajan; 
  • Taryn Lloyd; 
  • Eisi Mollanji; 
  • Navindra Persaud

ABSTRACT

Background:

Since medical cannabis was legalized in Canada in 2013, prescription of cannabis for medical purposes has become commonplace.

Objective:

We aimed to identify the indications for medical cannabis reported by cannabis clinics in Ontario, Canada, and the evidence these clinics cited to support cannabis prescription.

Methods:

We conducted a cross-sectional online search to identify all cannabis clinic websites within Ontario, Canada that had: (1) physician involvement and (2) identified their primary purpose as cannabis prescription. Two reviewers independently searched these websites to identify all medical indications for which cannabis was promoted and reviewed and critically appraised all studies cited using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence rubric.

Results:

29 clinics were identified, promoting cannabis for 20 different medical indications including migraines, insomnia, and fibromyalgia. There were 235 unique studies cited on these websites to support the effectiveness of cannabis for these indications. A high proportion (36; 15.3 % ) of the studies were identified to be at the lowest level of evidence (“Level 5”). Only 4 clinic websites included any mention of harms associated with cannabis.

Conclusions:

Cannabis clinic websites generally promote cannabis use as medically effective but cite low quality evidence to support these claims, and rarely discuss harms. Recommendation of cannabis as a general therapeutic for many indications unsupported by high quality evidence is potentially misleading for medical practitioners and patients. This disparity should be carefully evaluated in context of the specific medical indication and an individualized patient risk assessment.


 Citation

Please cite as:

O'Neill B, Ferguson J, Dalueg L, Yusuf A, Kirubarajan A, Lloyd T, Mollanji E, Persaud N

Evaluating the Supporting Evidence of Medical Cannabis Claims Made on Clinic Websites: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e45550

DOI: 10.2196/45550

PMID: 37384372

PMCID: 10365571

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.