Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Jan 30, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 27, 2022 - Jan 10, 2023
Date Accepted: Apr 18, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Profiles and Findings of Population-Based Esophageal Cancer Screening With Endoscopy in China: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Li H, Teng Y, Yan X, Cao M, Yang F, He S, Zhang S, Li Q, Xia C, Li K, Chen W

Profiles and Findings of Population-Based Esophageal Cancer Screening With Endoscopy in China: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e45360

DOI: 10.2196/45360

PMID: 37261899

PMCID: 10273033

Profiles and findings of population-based esophageal cancer screening with endoscopy in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • He Li; 
  • Yi Teng; 
  • Xinxin Yan; 
  • Maomao Cao; 
  • Fan Yang; 
  • Siyi He; 
  • Shaoli Zhang; 
  • Qianru Li; 
  • Changfa Xia; 
  • Kai Li; 
  • Wanqing Chen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Population-based esophageal cancer (EC) screening trials and programs have been conducted in China for decades; however, screening strategies were adopted in different regions, and screening profiles were unclear.

Objective:

We performed a meta-analysis to profile EC screening in China by positivity rate, compliance rate, and endoscopy findings, aiming to provide explicit evidence and recommendations for EC screening programs.

Methods:

English (MEDLINE, Embase) and Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang) language databases were systematically searched for population-based EC screening studies in the Chinese population until April 30, 2022. A meta-analysis was performed by standard methodology using a random effects model. Pooled prevalence rates were reported in three groups: high-risk areas for EC with a universal endoscopy strategy, rural China with a risk-stratified endoscopic screening (RSES) strategy, and urban China with an RSES strategy.

Results:

Sixty-five eligible studies were included, covering more than 2 million asymptomatic average-risk individuals and 979,338 individuals with endoscopic examinations. The pooled positivity rate of the high-risk population was higher in rural China (44.12%) than in urban China (23.11%). The compliance rate of endoscopic examinations was highest in rural China (52.43%), followed by high-risk areas for EC (44.42%), and the lowest in urban China (20.77%). The pooled detection rate of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) decreased from 1.09% (95% CI: 0.88-1.35%) in high-risk areas for EC to 0.48% (95% CI: 0.25-0.93%) in rural China and 0.12% (95% CI: 0.07-0.21%) in urban China. The pooled early detection rate was 82.64% (95% CI: 76.60-87.38%). A higher detection rate of HGIN was observed among males than among females and at older ages.

Conclusions:

Under the current screening framework, a higher screening benefit was observed in high-risk areas for EC than in other regions. To promote EC screening and improve the current inequality of screening benefits in China, more focus should be given to optimizing strategies of high-risk individual assessment and surveillance management to improve compliance with endoscopic examination. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO CRD42022375720


 Citation

Please cite as:

Li H, Teng Y, Yan X, Cao M, Yang F, He S, Zhang S, Li Q, Xia C, Li K, Chen W

Profiles and Findings of Population-Based Esophageal Cancer Screening With Endoscopy in China: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e45360

DOI: 10.2196/45360

PMID: 37261899

PMCID: 10273033

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.