Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Dec 26, 2022
Date Accepted: Oct 6, 2023
Effects of distance-learning strategies in dental fixed prosthodontics amidst COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study on preclinical dental students' perspective.
ABSTRACT
Background:
COVID-19’s high transmissibility led to gathering restrictions where dental schools were positioned to experience disruptions due to restrictions on attending in-person lectures as well as limitations placed on applied preclinical and clinical activities. Students not only had to rapidly switch to online technology based-learning (TB-learning) modules but also experienced high levels of social isolation and anxiety around the virus transmission.
Objective:
This study aims to evaluate the preclinical students' perception of switching TB-learning modules amidst COVID-19, identifying which module parameters were associated with strong student outcomes.
Methods:
A online survey of 39 Likert scale questions was delivered to preclinical dental students (Western University) to evaluate students' perceptions concerning TB-learning, fear amidst COVID-19 and the impact on their preclinical training. A Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was determined to estimate the relationship between two variables in isolation (P<.01). An ordinal regression analysis was performed on variables of interest to determine how module variables (typically within the instructor's control) influenced the student outcomes (P <.05).
Results:
The response rate was 30% (n=39). TB-learning was considered vital (87.2%) as the students’ education improved (46.2%). However, 53.8% of students showed increased difficulties in retaining, visualizing, or understanding the materials using TB-learning, and 64.1% found it more difficult to concentrate than in in-person classes. 79.5% of students showed different levels of agreement to feeling fatigued from TB-learning. Through Spearman's rho correlation analysis, quality of questions in quizzes (rs=0.514, P <.001), relevant handouts (rs=0.729, P <.001), and high-quality audiovisuals (rs=0.585, P <.001) were positively correlated with students responding that the modules were useful to preclinical training. Similarly, good organization (rs=0.512, P <.001), high-quality questions in quizzes (rs=0.431, P =.013), and relevant handouts (rs=0.551, P <.001) were positively correlated with online classes as an effective way to learn. 91.6% of the students agreed that Covid-19 was a dangerous disease, whereas 54% showed different levels of agreement that they were afraid to be infected personally, and 69% feared passing Covid-19 along to family and friends. 82% of the students showed that Covid-19 impacted their overall learning process and had a negative impact on their practical preclinical training (79.5%).
Conclusions:
The students found a difference between TB-learning and face-to-face learning methods, where the students perceived fatigue towards the online method with difficulty concentrating and visualizing the subject. Moreover, there was a consensus that COVID-19 itself affected the students’ overall learning process and preclinical training. As dental schools continue implementing TB-learning into their curriculum, this investigation identifies the students' struggles with the paradigm shift. In an effort to improve TB-learning, this work highlights four variables (organization, quizzes, quality handouts, and quality audiovisuals) within the control of instructors that can help improve content deliverance, improving the students' experience.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.