Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR AI

Date Submitted: Feb 2, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 1, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Machine Learning Models Versus the National Early Warning Score System for Predicting Deterioration: Retrospective Cohort Study in the United Arab Emirates

Lashen H, St John TL, Almallah Y, Sasidhar M, Shamout FE

Machine Learning Models Versus the National Early Warning Score System for Predicting Deterioration: Retrospective Cohort Study in the United Arab Emirates

JMIR AI 2023;2:e45257

DOI: 10.2196/45257

PMID: 38875543

PMCID: 11041421

Machine learning models outperform national early warning score in predicting deterioration in a retrospective cohort study in the United Arab Emirates

  • Hazem Lashen; 
  • Terrence Lee St John; 
  • Y.Zaki Almallah; 
  • Madhu Sasidhar; 
  • Farah E. Shamout

ABSTRACT

Background:

Early warning score (EWS) systems are widely used for identifying patients who are at the highest risk of deterioration to assist clinical decision-making. This could facilitate early intervention, and consequently improve patient outcomes. For example, the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), which is recommended by the Royal College of Physicians in the United Kingdom, assigns scores to routine vital signs based on pre-defined alerting thresholds. However, there is limited evidence on the reliability of such scores across patient cohorts in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Objective:

Our aim in this study is to propose an interpretable data-driven model for improved deterioration prediction in an in-patient cohort in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Methods:

We conduct a retrospective cohort study using a real-world dataset consisting of 25,853 in-patient encounters from 16,729 unique patients, collected between April 2015 and August 2021 at a large multi-specialty hospital in Abu Dhabi, UAE. We define an adverse event as the composite outcome of admission to the intensive care unit or mortality. Based on seven routine vital-sign measurements, we assess the performance of the NEWS in detecting deterioration within 24 hours using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC). We also develop and evaluate several machine learning models, including logistic regression, gradient boosting model, and a feed-forward neural network.

Results:

In a held-out test set of 2,534 encounters with 74,630 observation sets, NEWS achieves an overall AUROC of 0.682 (95% CI 0.670-0.695). In comparison, the best-performing machine learning models, which are the neural network and the gradient boosting model, achieve an AUROC of 0.735 (95% CI 0.723-0.746) and 0.736 (95% CI 0.724-0.748), respectively. Our interpretability results highlight the importance of respiratory rate and level of consciousness in predicting patient deterioration.

Conclusions:

While traditional EWS systems are the dominant form of deterioration prediction models in clinical practice today, we strongly recommend the development and use of cohort-specific machine learning models as an alternative. This is especially important in external patient cohorts that were unseen during model development.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lashen H, St John TL, Almallah Y, Sasidhar M, Shamout FE

Machine Learning Models Versus the National Early Warning Score System for Predicting Deterioration: Retrospective Cohort Study in the United Arab Emirates

JMIR AI 2023;2:e45257

DOI: 10.2196/45257

PMID: 38875543

PMCID: 11041421

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.