JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

Background:

In many health systems globally, digital health technologies (DHT) have become increasingly commonplace as a means of delivering primary care. COVID-19 has further increased the pace of this trend. While DHTs have been postulated to reduce inequalities, increase access, and strengthen health systems, how DHT implementation has been realised in the sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) healthcare environment remains to be further explored.

Objective:

To capture the multidisciplinary experiences of SSA experts and primary care healthcare providers using DHTs to explore the strengths and weaknesses, as well as opportunities and threats regarding the implementation and use of DHTs in SSA primary care settings.

Methods:

A combination of qualitative approaches was adopted (i.e., online focus groups and semi-structured interviews), using an online platform. Participants were recruited through AfroPHC and researchers contact networks, using convenience sampling, and included if having experience with digital technologies in primary health care in SSA. Focus and interviews were conducted, respectively, in November 2021 and January-March 2022. Topic guides were used to cover relevant topics in the interviews and focus groups, using the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) framework. Transcripts were compiled verbatim and systematically reviewed by two independent reviewers using thematic analysis to identify emerging themes. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was used to ensure the study meets the recommended standards of qualitative data reporting.

Results:

Strengths of DHT use ranged from improving access to care, supporting the continuity of care, and increasing care satisfaction and trust, to greater collaboration, enabling safer decision-making, and hastening progress towards universal health coverage. Weaknesses included poor digital literacy, health inequalities, lack of human resources, inadequate training, lack of basic infrastructure and equipment, and poor coordination when implementing DHTs. DHTs were perceived as an opportunity to improve patient digital literacy, increase equity, promote more patient-centric design in upcoming DHTs, streamline healthcare resource expenditure, and provide a means to learn international best practices. Major threats identified include the lack of buy-in from both patients and providers, insufficient human resources and local capacity, inadequate governmental support, overly restrictive regulations, and a lack of focus on cybersecurity and means for patient data protection.

Conclusions:

The research highlights the complex challenges of implementing DHTs in the SSA context, as a fast-moving health delivery modality, as well as the need for multi-stakeholder involvement. Future research should explore the nuances of these findings across different technologies and settings in the SSA region, and its implications on health and health care equity, capitalising on mixed-methods research, including the use of real-world quantitative data to understand patient health needs. The promise of digital health will only be realised when informed by studies that incorporate patient perspective at every stage of the research cycle.