Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 20, 2022
Date Accepted: May 10, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Effectiveness of Digital Apps Providing Personalized Exercise Videos: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Davergne T, Meidinger P, Dechertres A, Gossec L

The Effectiveness of Digital Apps Providing Personalized Exercise Videos: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e45207

DOI: 10.2196/45207

PMID: 37440300

PMCID: 10375281

The effectiveness of digital applications providing personalized exercise videos: a systematic review with meta-analysis

  • Thomas Davergne; 
  • Philippe Meidinger; 
  • Agnès Dechertres; 
  • Laure Gossec

ABSTRACT

Background:

Among available digital applications (Apps), those providing personalized video exercises (PEV) may be helpful for individuals undergoing functional rehabilitation.

Objective:

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of Apps providing PEV to support rehabilitation for people with disability, on functional capacity, confidence in exercise performance, use of care, health-related quality of life, adherence, and adverse events.

Methods:

In this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL and EMBASE databases up to March 2022. All randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of Apps providing PEV to support rehabilitation for any condition requiring physical rehabilitation were included. Selection, extraction and risk of bias assessment (RoB2) were performed by two independent reviewers. Primary outcome was functional capacity at the end of the intervention. Secondary outcomes included confidence in exercise performance, care consumption, health-related quality of life, adherence, and adverse events. A meta-analysis was performed where possible; the magnitude of the effect was assessed with the standardized mean difference (SMD).

Results:

From 1641 identified references, 10 articles (1050 participants, 93% adults) were included: 7 articles (906 participants) concerned musculoskeletal disorders; 3 (144 participants) concerned neurological disorders, and 2 (332 participants) were employee-based. The Apps were mostly commercial (7/10); the videos were mostly elaborated by a physiotherapist (8/10). Duration of App use was 3-48 weeks. All included studies had a high overall risk of bias. Low-quality evidence suggested the use of Apps providing PEV led to a significant, small to moderate improvement in physical function (SMD 0.35 [95% CI 0.19 to 0.51], Phet=0.86; I²=0%) and confidence in exercise performance (SMD 0.67 [0.37 to 0.96], phet=0.22; I²=33%). Because of the very low quality of the evidence, the effects on quality of life and exercise adherence were uncertain. Apps did not influence rate of adverse events.

Conclusions:

Apps providing PEV to support exercise performance significantly improved physical function and confidence in exercise performance. However, the level of evidence was low: more robust studies are needed to confirm these results. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO: CRD42022323670


 Citation

Please cite as:

Davergne T, Meidinger P, Dechertres A, Gossec L

The Effectiveness of Digital Apps Providing Personalized Exercise Videos: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e45207

DOI: 10.2196/45207

PMID: 37440300

PMCID: 10375281

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.