Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Dec 13, 2022
Date Accepted: May 29, 2023
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Scientific uncertainty leads to sociopolitical stabilization in turmoil: Analysis of COVID-19 article construction on Japanese Wikipedia
ABSTRACT
Background:
A worldwide overabundance of information comprising misinformation, rumor, and propaganda, concerning COVID-19 can be observed occurring alongside the pandemic itself. In opposing the challenges of this information turmoil, Wikipedia has become an important source of information.
Objective:
This study investigated the ways that the editors of Wikipedia have handled COVID-19 information. Specifically, it focused on the following two questions. 1) What knowledge background do the editors who participated in the production of information on COVID-19 have? 2) How did editors with different knowledge backgrounds collaborate?
Methods:
This study used a large-scale dataset including over 2 million edits in the histories of 1,857 editors who involved in editing 133 articles related to COVID-19 in Japanese Wikipedia. Machine learning methods, including graph neural network methods, Bayesian inference, and Granger causality analysis, were used to establish the editors’ backgrounds and collaboration patterns.
Results:
Three tendencies were identified. 1) Two groups of editors were involved in the production of information on COVID-19. One group had a strong background in sociopolitical topics (soc-pol group), and the other group had a strong background in scientific and medical topics (sci-med group). 2) The soc-pol group played the central role (contributing 70.04% of the contents and 75.61% of the references) in the information production part of the COVID-19 articles on Wikipedia, Here, the sci-med group played only a secondary role. 3) The severity of the pandemic in Japan activated the editing behaviors of the soc-pol group and made them contribute more to the COVID-19 information production in Wikipedia, but it reduced the activation of the editing behaviors of the sci-med group and made them contribute less (correlation coefficient = 0.231, P < .001).
Conclusions:
This study showed how crowd-sourced, community-produced knowledge of COVID-19 was developed through collaboration in the face of scientific uncertainty with reference to the novel pandemic of COVID-19; because the discussions of COVID-19 from a sociopolitical perspective were more controversial, the Wikipedia community expended more effort in editing and revising this information to ensure its quality and reliability.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.