Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 16, 2022
Date Accepted: Jul 20, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Challenges With the Use of Digital Sham: Systematic Review and Recommendations

Bos E, Preller KH, Kaur G, Malhotra P, Kharawala S, Motti D

Challenges With the Use of Digital Sham: Systematic Review and Recommendations

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44764

DOI: 10.2196/44764

PMID: 37874638

PMCID: 10630857

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Challenges with the Use of Digital Sham: A Systematic Review and Recommendations

  • Ernst Bos; 
  • Katrin H. Preller; 
  • Gavneet Kaur; 
  • Pooja Malhotra; 
  • Saifuddin Kharawala; 
  • Dario Motti

ABSTRACT

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are software-based products that prevent, manage, or treat a medical condition, and are delivered through a smartphone app, web application or wearable. Clinical trials assessing DTx pose challenges, foremost amongst which is designing appropriate ‘digital shams’ (or ‘digital placebos’), which should ideally mimic the DTx (in terms of design, components and duration of treatment) while omitting the active principle/component. To understand how digital shams are being used in clinical research on DTx, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of DTx in neuroscience (including neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders) with a focus on controlled clinical trials involving digital shams. Our search criteria identified 461 neuroscience studies involving 213 unique DTx. Most DTx were extended reality-based (40.4%) or mobile device-based (26.3%); 313 were comparative, of which 68 used shams. The most common therapeutic areas assessed in these studies were stroke (19.7%), depression (15%) and anxiety (11.3%); and the most common treatments were cognitive behavioral therapy/behavioral therapy (32.4%), physical rehabilitation (28.2%), and cognitive training (19.2%).

Results:

We identified the following important issues related to the use of digital shams: shams were not validated prior to use in studies; they varied widely in design; (from being near-identical to the DTx to using different software programs altogether); the level of patient engagement/satisfaction with the sham and the impact of the sham on study outcomes was infrequently reported.

Conclusions:

Digital shams are critical to the clinical development of DTx. Given the importance of sham controls in evaluating DTx efficacy, we provide recommendations on the key information that should be reported in a well-designed DTx trial and propose an algorithm to allow correct interpretation of DTx study results. Sham-controlled studies should be routinely used in DTx trials – in early phase studies, to help identify DTx active components, and in late-phase studies, to confirm the efficacy of DTx. Use of shams early in development will ensure that the appropriate sham control is used in later confirmatory trials.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bos E, Preller KH, Kaur G, Malhotra P, Kharawala S, Motti D

Challenges With the Use of Digital Sham: Systematic Review and Recommendations

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44764

DOI: 10.2196/44764

PMID: 37874638

PMCID: 10630857

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.