Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Dec 1, 2022
Date Accepted: May 24, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of Multicomponent Interventions in Office-Based Workers to Mitigate Occupational Sedentary Behavior: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhou L, Deng X, Guo K, Hou L, Hui X, Wu Y, Xu M, Wang Y, Liang S, Yang K, Li X

Effectiveness of Multicomponent Interventions in Office-Based Workers to Mitigate Occupational Sedentary Behavior: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e44745

DOI: 10.2196/44745

PMID: 37494100

PMCID: 10413238

Multicomponent Intervention in Office-based Workers to Mitigate Occupational Sedentary Behavior: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Liying Zhou; 
  • Xinxin Deng; 
  • Kangle Guo; 
  • Liangying Hou; 
  • Xu Hui; 
  • Yanan Wu; 
  • Meng Xu; 
  • Yongsheng Wang; 
  • Shanshan Liang; 
  • Kehu Yang; 
  • Xiuxia Li

ABSTRACT

Background:

With the continuous mechanization, automation, and informatization of society, substantial labor jobs have been transformed into the sedentary service industry and office-based professions coinciding with fewer energy expenditures and physical activity opportunities. Sedentary time in the workplace has been linked to chronic occupational diseases.

Objective:

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to reduce sedentary behavior at work compared to no intervention.

Methods:

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of the multicomponent intervention on the occupational sedentary behavior of office-based workers until 17 May 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate continuous variables. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 15.1 software. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.

Results:

10 RCTs involving 1138 patients were analyzed. Three studies were rated as having a low risk of bias, and seven had a high risk. The meta-analysis results show that, compared to no intervention, the multicomponent intervention significantly reduced occupational sitting time (MD = 48.73 min/8-h workday; 95% CI = 70.08 to 27.37) and occupational prolonged sitting time (MD = 39.65 min/8-h workday; 95% CI = 66.04 to 13.25) and increased occupational standing time (MD = 46. 12 min/8-h workday; 95% CI = 17.88 to 74.37), while no significant differences were found in occupational stepping time. The GRADE evidence summary of certainty showed that all four outcomes were rated as low.

Conclusions:

The multicomponent intervention is indeed effective in reducing sedentary behavior in the workplace but may need to be accompanied by the sit-stand workstation. Clinical Trial: Our study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO); registration number: CRD42022348003.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhou L, Deng X, Guo K, Hou L, Hui X, Wu Y, Xu M, Wang Y, Liang S, Yang K, Li X

Effectiveness of Multicomponent Interventions in Office-Based Workers to Mitigate Occupational Sedentary Behavior: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e44745

DOI: 10.2196/44745

PMID: 37494100

PMCID: 10413238

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.