Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Nov 28, 2022
Date Accepted: Mar 30, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 3, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Visual Analytic Tool (VIADS) to Assist the Hypothesis Generation Process in Clinical Research: Mixed Methods Usability Study

Jing X, Patel VL, Cimino JJ, Shubrook JH, Zhou Y, Draghi B, Ernst M, Liu C, De Lacalle S

A Visual Analytic Tool (VIADS) to Assist the Hypothesis Generation Process in Clinical Research: Mixed Methods Usability Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e44644

DOI: 10.2196/44644

PMID: 37011112

PMCID: 10176142

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A visual analytic tool to assist hypothesis generation process in clinical research—A utility and usability study of VIADS using mixed-methods

  • Xia Jing; 
  • Vimla L Patel; 
  • James J Cimino; 
  • Jay H Shubrook; 
  • Yuchun Zhou; 
  • Brooke Draghi; 
  • Mytchell Ernst; 
  • Chang Liu; 
  • Sonsoles De Lacalle

ABSTRACT

Background:

Visualization can be a powerful tool for comprehending datasets, especially when datasets can be represented via hierarchical structures. Enhanced comprehension can facilitate users to develop scientific hypotheses. However, the inclusion of excessive data can make a visualization overwhelming.

Objective:

We developed a Visual Interactive Analytic tool for filtering and summarizing large health Data Sets (VIADS) coded with hierarchical terminologies. In this study, we evaluated the usability and utility of VIADS for visualizing datasets of patients’ diagnoses and procedures coded in ICD-9-CM.

Methods:

We used mixed methods in the study. A group of 12 clinical researchers participated in data-driven hypotheses generation using the same datasets and time frame (a 1-hour training session and a 2-hour study session), utilizing VIADS via the think-aloud protocol. The audio and screen activities were recorded remotely. A modified version of the System Usability Scale (SUS) and a brief survey with open-ended questions were administered after the study.

Results:

The range of SUS scores was 37.5–87.5. The mean SUS score for VIADS was 71.88 (± 14.62) (out of a possible 100), and the median SUS was 75. Participants agreed unanimously that VIADS offers new perspectives on datasets (100%); while 75% of participants agreed that VIADS facilitates the understanding, presentation, and interpretation of underlying datasets. The comments on the utility of VIADS were overwhelmingly positive and aligned very well with the design purposes of VIADS. The answers to the open-ended questions in the modified SUS provided specific suggestions from participants about how VIADS could be improved. Identified problems in usability were used to update the tool.

Conclusions:

This usability and utility study demonstrated that VIADS is high in utility with a good average usability SUS score and a valuable tool for analyzing secondary datasets. Currently, VIADS accepts datasets with hierarchical codes and their corresponding frequencies. Accordingly, the analytical results support only particular types of use cases. Nevertheless, participants unanimously agreed that VIADS provides new perspectives on datasets and is relatively easy to use. The functionalities mostly appreciated by participants were VIADS’ ability to filter, summarize, compare, and visualize data.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jing X, Patel VL, Cimino JJ, Shubrook JH, Zhou Y, Draghi B, Ernst M, Liu C, De Lacalle S

A Visual Analytic Tool (VIADS) to Assist the Hypothesis Generation Process in Clinical Research: Mixed Methods Usability Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e44644

DOI: 10.2196/44644

PMID: 37011112

PMCID: 10176142

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.