Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Nov 16, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 16, 2022 - Jan 11, 2023
Date Accepted: Apr 30, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Student and Faculty Perspectives on the Usefulness and Usability of a Digital Health Educational Tool to Teach Standardized Assessment of Persons After Stroke: Mixed Methods Study

Deutsch JE, Palmieri JL, Gorin H, Wendell A, Wohn Y, Damodaran H

Student and Faculty Perspectives on the Usefulness and Usability of a Digital Health Educational Tool to Teach Standardized Assessment of Persons After Stroke: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e44361

DOI: 10.2196/44361

PMID: 37561552

PMCID: 10450535

Student and Faculty Perspectives about Usefulness and Usability of a Digital Health Educational Tool to Teach Standardized Assessment of Persons Post-Stroke: Mixed Methods

  • Judith E Deutsch; 
  • John L Palmieri; 
  • Holly Gorin; 
  • Augustus Wendell; 
  • Yvette Wohn; 
  • Harish Damodaran

ABSTRACT

Background &

Objective:

The VSTEP Examination Suite, a collection of evidence-based standardized assessments for persons post-stroke, was evaluated as an educational tool by physical therapy students and faculty.

Methods:

Six students from a Doctor of Physical Therapy program in the US and six faculty who teach standardized assessments in different physical therapy programs from the US and Israel interacted with the system using a talk-aloud procedure. Transcripts were coded deductively with a priori categories of usability, usefulness and labeled with negative or positive valences. A second round of inductive coding yielded emergent themes based on theories of technology adoption, clinical reasoning and education.

Results:

Frequencies and valences of the deductive themes of usefulness and usability were tested for differences between faculty and students using a Wilcoxon Sign Rank test. Faculty comments with positive valence for usefulness were lowest for the 6MWT (83%) and for the students on the 4SQT (92%). Usefulness scores were not significantly different between faculty and students. For usability, faculty and students had the lowest positive valence scores for the 10MWT (50%). Students had a statistically significant higher number of negative usability comments compared to faculty (W=0, p =0.017) specifically for the 5XSTS (W=0.5, p = 0.022). Themes emerged related to variable knowledge about the standardized tests, value as a teaching and learning tool, technology being consistent with clinical reasoning in addition to ensuring reliability, expert-to-novice clinical reasoning (students) and usability.

Conclusions:

The VSTEP was found to be useful by both faculty and students, and usability testing revealed opportunities for technology refinement.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Deutsch JE, Palmieri JL, Gorin H, Wendell A, Wohn Y, Damodaran H

Student and Faculty Perspectives on the Usefulness and Usability of a Digital Health Educational Tool to Teach Standardized Assessment of Persons After Stroke: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e44361

DOI: 10.2196/44361

PMID: 37561552

PMCID: 10450535

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.