Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 15, 2022
Date Accepted: Apr 14, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Text Analysis of Trends in Health Equity and Disparities From the Internal Revenue Service Tax Documentation Submitted by US Nonprofit Hospitals Between 2010 and 2019: Exploratory Study

Hadley E, Marcial L, Quattrone W, Bobashev G

Text Analysis of Trends in Health Equity and Disparities From the Internal Revenue Service Tax Documentation Submitted by US Nonprofit Hospitals Between 2010 and 2019: Exploratory Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44330

DOI: 10.2196/44330

PMID: 37223985

PMCID: 10248774

Text Analysis of Trends in Health Equity and Disparities from IRS Tax Documentation Submitted by U.S. Nonprofit Hospitals between 2010 and 2019

  • Emily Hadley; 
  • Laura Marcial; 
  • Wes Quattrone; 
  • Georgiy Bobashev

ABSTRACT

Background:

Many U.S. hospitals are classified as nonprofits and receive tax-exempt status partially in exchange for providing benefits to the community. Proof of compliance is collected with the Schedule H form submitted as part of the annual IRS Form 990, including a free-response text section that is known for being ambiguous and unaudited. This research is among the first to use natural language processing approaches to evaluate this text section with a focus on health equity and disparity.

Objective:

Determine the extent to which free response text in Schedule H reveals how nonprofit hospitals address health equity and disparity needs, including alignment with public interest and prioritization.

Methods:

We use free-response text submitted by hospital reporting entities in Part III, V, and VI of IRS Form 990 Schedule H between 2010 and 2019. We identified 29 main themes connected with health equity and disparity and 152 related key phrases. We tallied occurrences of these phrases through term frequency analysis, analyzed Google Trends usage for the same terms during the same period, and used semantic search to understand contextual usage.

Results:

We found increased usage from 2010 to 2019 across all 29 phrase themes related to health equity and disparity. However, usage in themes like LGBTQ and environmental issues remained well below public interest in these topics, and some increased mentions were to explicitly say that no action was taken.

Conclusions:

Hospital reporting entities are demonstrating an increasing awareness of health equity and disparity topics in community benefits tax documentation, but these do not necessarily correspond with general population interests or additional action. We propose further investigation exploring alignment of Schedule H text with programming described in Community Health Needs Assessments (CHNAs) to understand if this is associated with increased community benefits programming.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hadley E, Marcial L, Quattrone W, Bobashev G

Text Analysis of Trends in Health Equity and Disparities From the Internal Revenue Service Tax Documentation Submitted by US Nonprofit Hospitals Between 2010 and 2019: Exploratory Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44330

DOI: 10.2196/44330

PMID: 37223985

PMCID: 10248774

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.