Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: Nov 17, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 2, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: Feb 3, 2023
Engagement and utilization of a complete remote digital care program for musculoskeletal pain management in urban and rural areas across the United States: Longitudinal Cohort Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are the number one cause of disability worldwide. Digital care programs (DCPs) for MSK pain management have risen as alternative care delivery models to circumvent challenges in accessibility of conventional therapy. Despite the potential of DCPs to reduce inequities in accessing care, the outcomes of such interventions in rural and urban populations have yet to be studied.
Objective:
The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of urban and rural residencies on engagement and clinical outcomes after a multimodal DCP for MSK pain.
Methods:
The study consists of an ad hoc analysis of a decentralized single-arm investigation into engagement and clinical-related outcomes after a multimodal DCP in patients with MSK conditions. Patients were coded according to their zip codes to a specific rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) code, and grouped into rural and urban cohorts. Their engagement, as well as clinical outcome changes from baseline to program-end were assessed. Latent growth curve analysis was performed to estimate change trajectories adjusting for the following covariates: age, gender, body mass index, employment status and pain acuity. Outcomes included engagement, self-reported pain, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 30% was considered for pain.
Results:
Patients from urban and rural residencies across all the U.S. participated in the program (N=9992). A 73.8% completion rate was observed. Both groups reported high satisfaction scores and similar engagement with exercise sessions, with rural residents showing higher engagement with educational content (P<.001) and higher program completion rates (P=.02). All groups showed a significant improvement in all clinical outcomes without inter-group statistical significance, including pain, mental health and work productivity. The percentage of patients meeting the MCID was similar in both groups (urban: 67%, rural: 68.7%, P=.24).
Conclusions:
This study advocates for the utility of a DCP in improving access to MSK care in urban and rural areas alike, showcasing its potential to promote health equity. High engagement, satisfaction and completion rates were noted in both groups, as well as significant improvements in clinical outcomes. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04092946
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.