Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 30, 2022
Date Accepted: Mar 14, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Similar Outcomes of Web-Based and Face-to-Face Training of the GRADE Approach for the Certainty of Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trial

Tokalić R, Poklepović Peričić T, Marusic A

Similar Outcomes of Web-Based and Face-to-Face Training of the GRADE Approach for the Certainty of Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e43928

DOI: 10.2196/43928

PMID: 37279050

PMCID: 10282904

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Similar outcomes of online and face to face training of GRADE approach for certainty of evidence: a randomized controlled study

  • Ružica Tokalić; 
  • Tina Poklepović Peričić; 
  • Ana Marusic

ABSTRACT

Background:

GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a system for transparent evaluation of certainty of evidence, used in clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews.

Objective:

To compare online and face-to-face methods of teaching GRADE approach for evidence assessment.

Methods:

Randomised controlled trial on two delivery modes of GRADE education integrated into a course on research methodology and evidence-based medicine with 3rd year medical students. Education was based on the 90-minute Cochrane Interactive Learning (CIL) 'Interpreting the findings'. Online group received the online asynchronous training, while the face-to-face group had a seminar with a lecturer. Main outcome measure was the score on a five-question test that assessed confidence interval interpretation and overall certainty of evidence, among others. Secondary outcomes included writing a recommendation for practice and course satisfaction.

Results:

50 participants received the online intervention and 47 participants received the face-to-face intervention. The groups did not differ in the overall scores for the CIL test. When analysed separately, face-to-face group better assessed the overall certainty of evidence question. Students avoided clear clinical decisions when writing recommendations. Course satisfaction was high in both groups.

Conclusions:

Training in GRADE approach may be equally effective in online and face-to-face formats.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tokalić R, Poklepović Peričić T, Marusic A

Similar Outcomes of Web-Based and Face-to-Face Training of the GRADE Approach for the Certainty of Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e43928

DOI: 10.2196/43928

PMID: 37279050

PMCID: 10282904

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.