Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Oct 20, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 20, 2022 - Dec 15, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 21, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Learning From Experience And Finding The Right Balance In The Governance Of AI-based And Digital Health Technologies: A Perspective
ABSTRACT
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning medical tools have the potential to be transformative in care delivery, however this change will only be realised if accompanied by effective governance that ensures patient safety and public trust. Recent digital health initiatives have called for tighter governance of digital health. The correct balance must be found between ensuring product safety and performance whilst also enabling the innovation needed to deliver better approaches for patients and affordable efficient healthcare for society. This requires innovative, fit-for-purpose approaches to regulation. Digital health technologies, particularly AI-based tools, pose specific challenges to the development and implementation of functional regulation. The approaches of regulatory science and ‘better regulation’ have a critical role in developing and evaluating solutions to these problems and ensuring effective implementation. We describe the divergent approaches of the EU and the US in the implementation of new regulatory approaches in digital health and we consider the UK as a third example, which is in a unique position of developing a new post-Brexit regulatory framework.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.