Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Oct 17, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 5, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study

Wang L, Wang Y, Wang F, Gao Y, Fang Z, Gong W, Li H, Zhu C, Chen Y, Shi L, Du L, Li N

Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e43586

DOI: 10.2196/43586

PMID: 36917151

PMCID: 10131892

Disparity in lung cancer screening among smokers and non-smokers in China: Prospective cohort study

  • Le Wang; 
  • Youqing Wang; 
  • Fei Wang; 
  • Yumeng Gao; 
  • Zhimei Fang; 
  • Weiwei Gong; 
  • Huizhang Li; 
  • Chen Zhu; 
  • Yaoyao Chen; 
  • Lei Shi; 
  • Lingbin Du; 
  • Ni Li

ABSTRACT

Background:

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is effective in reducing lung cancer mortality in smokers, however the evidence in non-smokers is scarce.

Objective:

We aimed to evaluate the participant rate and effectiveness of one-off LDCT screening for lung cancer among smokers and non-smokers.

Methods:

A population-based prospective cohort study was performed to enroll participants aged 40 to 74 years from 2013 to 2019 from four cities of Zhejiang Province, China. Participants who were evaluated with high-risk of lung cancer from an established risk-score model were recommended to undertake LDCT screening. Follow-up outcomes were retrieved by 30 June 2020. The uptake rate of LDCT screening for evaluated high-risk participants and detection rate of early-stage lung cancer (stage 0–I) were calculated. The incident lung cancer, lung cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared among high-risk screened group and non-screened group.

Results:

At baseline, 18,818 (62.6%) out of 30,379 smokers and 5,483 (6.0%) out of 91,455 non-smokers were identified as high-risk (P <.001), of whom 7,885 (41.9%) and 3,636 (66.3%) underwent LDCT screening (P <.001). After a median follow-up of 5.1 year, 1100 lung cancer cases, 456 all-cause death cases, and 116 lung cancer death cases were observed. The proportion of early-stage lung cancer was 60.4% (n = 173) among smokers and 80.3% (n = 476) among non-smokers, and a higher proportion was found in the screened group (67.9%) than the non-screened group (49.1%) among smokers (P =.005), while no significant results were found (95.5% vs. 83.3%; P=.198) among non-smokers. Compared with non-screened, LDCT screening in smokers significantly increased lung cancer incidence (HR=1.39, 95% CI 1.09–1.76), reduced lung cancer mortality (HR=0.52, 95% CI 0.28–0.96) and all-cause mortality (HR=0.47, 95% CI 0.32–0.69). Among non-smokers, no significant results were found for lung cancer incidence (P =.055), all-cause mortality (P =.89) and lung cancer mortality (P =.17).

Conclusions:

LDCT screening effectively reduces lung cancer and all-cause mortality among high-risk smokers. The participant rate and early detection of lung cancer was higher among non-smokers than smokers. Further efforts to defining high-risk population and exploring adequate lung cancer screening modality for non-smokers are needed.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang L, Wang Y, Wang F, Gao Y, Fang Z, Gong W, Li H, Zhu C, Chen Y, Shi L, Du L, Li N

Disparity in Lung Cancer Screening Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in China: Prospective Cohort Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e43586

DOI: 10.2196/43586

PMID: 36917151

PMCID: 10131892

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.