Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Oct 15, 2022
Date Accepted: Mar 13, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Situating Meditation Apps Within the Ecosystem of Meditation Practice: Population-Based Survey Study

Lam SU, Xie Q, Goldberg SB

Situating Meditation Apps Within the Ecosystem of Meditation Practice: Population-Based Survey Study

JMIR Ment Health 2023;10:e43565

DOI: 10.2196/43565

PMID: 37115618

PMCID: 10182467

Situating meditation apps within the ecosystem of meditation practice: A population-based survey study in the United States

  • Sin U Lam; 
  • Qiang Xie; 
  • Simon B. Goldberg

ABSTRACT

Background:

Meditation apps have the potential to increase access to evidence-based strategies to promote mental health. However, it is currently unclear how meditation apps are situated within the broader landscape of meditation practice and what factors may influence engagement with meditation apps.

Objective:

The current study aimed to clarify the prevalence and correlates of meditation app usage in a population-based sample of individuals with lifetime exposure to meditation in the United States (US). In addition, we sought to identify concerns and desired features of meditation apps among those with lifetime exposure to meditation.

Methods:

A total of 953 participants completed an initial screening survey. Of these, 434 reported lifetime exposure to meditation and completed a follow-up survey (92.3% response rate) assessing their meditation app use, anxiety, depression, loneliness, initial motivation for meditation, and concerns about and desired features of meditation apps.

Results:

Almost half of the participants (49.3%) who completed the screening survey reported lifetime exposure to meditation. Among those with lifetime exposure to meditation (i.e., meditators), more than half (58.76%) used meditation apps at least once in their life and 21.66% used meditation apps weekly or daily (i.e., active users). Younger age, higher anxiety, and having a mental health motivation for practicing meditation were associated with lifetime exposure to meditation apps. Among meditators, those with lifetime exposure to meditation apps were more likely to report concerns about apps including concerns regarding the cost and effectiveness of apps, time required for use, technical issues within apps, and app user-friendliness. Meditators who used meditation apps weekly or daily (i.e., active users) were younger, were less likely to be male, lower income, and non-Hispanic White, and were more likely to have an initial spiritual motivation for meditation. Active users reported more concerns regarding usability and technical problems and were less likely to report disinterest in apps. Headspace and Calm were the most frequently used apps. Tips and reminders for practice, encouragement for “mini” practices, and mental health content were the most desired features. Participants were less interested in social features (e.g., the ability to communicate with other users and/or teachers).

Conclusions:

Meditation apps are commonly used by US meditators, with higher use among certain demographic groups. Future studies may increase user engagement in meditation apps by addressing concerns (e.g., cost, effectiveness) and incorporating desired features (e.g., tips and reminders for practice).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lam SU, Xie Q, Goldberg SB

Situating Meditation Apps Within the Ecosystem of Meditation Practice: Population-Based Survey Study

JMIR Ment Health 2023;10:e43565

DOI: 10.2196/43565

PMID: 37115618

PMCID: 10182467

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.