Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 1, 2022
Date Accepted: May 26, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Machine and Deep Learning for Tuberculosis Detection on Chest X-Rays: Systematic Literature Review

Hansun S, Argha A, Liaw ST, Celler BG, Marks GB

Machine and Deep Learning for Tuberculosis Detection on Chest X-Rays: Systematic Literature Review

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e43154

DOI: 10.2196/43154

PMID: 37399055

PMCID: 10365622

Machine and Deep Learning for Tuberculosis Detection on Chest X-Rays: Systematic Literature Review

  • Seng Hansun; 
  • Ahmadreza Argha; 
  • Siaw-Teng Liaw; 
  • Branko George Celler; 
  • Guy Barrington Marks

ABSTRACT

Background:

Tuberculosis (TB) was the leading infectious cause of mortality globally prior to COVID-19 and chest radiography has an important role in the detection, and subsequent diagnosis, of patients with this disease. The conventional experts (radiologists) reading has substantial within-and between-observer variability, indicating poor reliability of human readers. There has been substantial work in utilising various Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based algorithms to address the limitations of human reading of chest radiographs for diagnosing TB.

Objective:

This systematic literature review (SLR) aims to assess the role of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) in the detection of tuberculosis (TB) using chest radiography (CXR).

Methods:

In conducting and reporting the SLR, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines. A total of 309 records was identified from Scopus, PubMed, and IEEE. We independently screened, reviewed, and assessed all available records and included 47 studies that met the inclusion criteria in this SLR.

Results:

DL is more commonly used than ML in the included studies. Most studies used human radiologist’s report as the reference standard. Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN), and Random Forest (RF) were the most popular ML approaches. Meanwhile, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) were the most commonly used DL techniques, with the four most popular applications being ResNet-50, VGG-16, VGG-19, and AlexNet. Based on data from ten studies we estimated the pooled sensitivity of ML/DL methods was 0.9857 (95% CI: 0.9477-1.00) and a pooled specificity was 0.9805 (95% CI: 0.9255-1.00).

Conclusions:

Findings from this SLR confirm the high potential of both ML and DL for TB detection using CXR.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hansun S, Argha A, Liaw ST, Celler BG, Marks GB

Machine and Deep Learning for Tuberculosis Detection on Chest X-Rays: Systematic Literature Review

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e43154

DOI: 10.2196/43154

PMID: 37399055

PMCID: 10365622

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.