Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 29, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 29, 2022 - Nov 24, 2022
Date Accepted: Apr 4, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 5, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Machine Learning Approaches to Classify Self-Reported Rheumatoid Arthritis Health Scores Using Activity Tracker Data: Longitudinal Observational Study

Rao K, Speier W, Meng Y, Wang J, Ramesh N, Xie F, Su Y, Nowell B, Curtis J, Arnold C

Machine Learning Approaches to Classify Self-Reported Rheumatoid Arthritis Health Scores Using Activity Tracker Data: Longitudinal Observational Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e43107

DOI: 10.2196/43107

PMID: 37017471

PMCID: 10337464

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Machine Learning Approaches to Classify Self-Reported Rheumatoid Arthritis Health Scores Using Activity Tracker Data

  • Kaushal Rao; 
  • William Speier; 
  • Yiwen Meng; 
  • Jinhan Wang; 
  • Nidhi Ramesh; 
  • Fenglong Xie; 
  • Yujie Su; 
  • Benjamin Nowell; 
  • Jeffrey Curtis; 
  • Corey Arnold

ABSTRACT

Background:

NA

Objective:

The increasing use of activity trackers in mobile health studies to passively collect physical data has shown promise in addressing patient adherence issues. The goal of this study was to develop machine learning models to classify patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores using Fitbit data from a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods:

Two different models were built to classify PRO scores; the random forest (RF) Classifier model treated each week of observations independently when making weekly predictions of PRO scores, while the hidden Markov model (HMM) additionally took correlations between successive weeks into account. Analyses compared model evaluation metrics for: 1) a binary task of distinguishing a normal PRO score from a severe PRO score, and 2) a multiclass task of classifying a PRO score state for a given week.

Results:

For both the binary and multiclass tasks, the HMM significantly (p < 0.05) outperformed the RF for a majority of PRO scores, and the highest AUC, Pearson’s Correlation coefficient, and Cohen’s Kappa coefficient were 0.751, 0.458, and 0.450 respectively.

Conclusions:

While further research on this topic is needed to validate our results and findings for use in a real-world setting, this study demonstrates the ability of physical activity tracker data to classify health status over time in patients with RA and enables the possibility of scheduling preventive clinical interventions as needed. If patient outcomes can be monitored in real time, there is potential to improve clinical care for patients with other chronic conditions as well. Clinical Trial: NA


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rao K, Speier W, Meng Y, Wang J, Ramesh N, Xie F, Su Y, Nowell B, Curtis J, Arnold C

Machine Learning Approaches to Classify Self-Reported Rheumatoid Arthritis Health Scores Using Activity Tracker Data: Longitudinal Observational Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e43107

DOI: 10.2196/43107

PMID: 37017471

PMCID: 10337464

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.