Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Sep 28, 2022
Date Accepted: Dec 18, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 19, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Ontologies Applied in Clinical Decision Support System Rules: Systematic Review

Jing X, Min H, Gong Y, Biondich P, Robinson D, Law T, Nohr C, Faxvaag A, Rennert L, Hubig N, Gimbel R

Ontologies Applied in Clinical Decision Support System Rules: Systematic Review

JMIR Med Inform 2023;11:e43053

DOI: 10.2196/43053

PMID: 36534739

PMCID: 9896360

A Systematic Review of Ontologies Applied in Clinical Decision Support System Rules

  • Xia Jing; 
  • Hua Min; 
  • Yang Gong; 
  • Paul Biondich; 
  • David Robinson; 
  • Timothy Law; 
  • Christian Nohr; 
  • Arild Faxvaag; 
  • Lior Rennert; 
  • Nina Hubig; 
  • Ronald Gimbel

ABSTRACT

Background:

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) play a critical role in the quality and safety of healthcare delivery. Although CDSS rules direct CDSS behavior, CDSS rules have not been routinely shared and reused.

Objective:

Ontology has the potential to promote the reusing of CDSS rules. Therefore, we systematically screened literature to elaborate on the current status of ontology applied in CDSS rules, e.g., rule management (uses the captured CDSS rule usage data and users’ feedback data to customize CDSS services to be more accurate) and maintenance (updates CDSS rules). We aim to delineate the frontlines of ontologies applied in CDSS rules via this systematic literature review.

Methods:

The literature search was focused on ontology, clinical decision support, and rules in PubMed, the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, and the Nursing & Allied Health Database. Grounded theory and PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed. One author started the screening and literature analysis, and two validated the processes and results. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed and refined iteratively.

Results:

Among the 81 included publications, CDSS were mainly applied to managing chronic conditions, alerts for medication prescriptions, reminders for immunizations and preventive services, diagnoses, and treatment recommendations. The CDSS rules were presented in Semantic Web Rule Language, Jess, or Jena formats. Despite ontologies being used to supply medical knowledge, CDSS rules, and terminologies, ontologies have not been used in CDSS rule management or facilitate the reusing of CDSS rules.

Conclusions:

Ontologies have been used to organize and represent medical knowledge and controlled vocabularies that contribute to CDSS and the content of CDSS rules. So far, there is a lack of reusing CDSS rules. More efforts are needed to improve the reusability and interoperability of CDSS rules. This paper delineated the ontologies, enabling Semantic Web technology, despite inadequate, and their applications in CDSS rules.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jing X, Min H, Gong Y, Biondich P, Robinson D, Law T, Nohr C, Faxvaag A, Rennert L, Hubig N, Gimbel R

Ontologies Applied in Clinical Decision Support System Rules: Systematic Review

JMIR Med Inform 2023;11:e43053

DOI: 10.2196/43053

PMID: 36534739

PMCID: 9896360

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.