Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics (no longer under consideration since Oct 08, 2022)
Date Submitted: Sep 26, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 26, 2022 - Oct 8, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Effect of Outpatient Web-Based Online Self Scheduling vs. Traditionally Staff Scheduling Systems on Progression to Surgery and No-Show Rates
ABSTRACT
Background:
Our orthopedic practice recently implemented a system that enables patients to schedule outpatient visits through an online portal without the need for traditional communication with office staff. Previous studies have found that the use of web-based scheduling correlates with reduced no show rates, staff labor, waiting time, and improved patient satisfaction. The appropriateness of the web-based scheduling and the rate of progression to surgery is unclear, as patients may not be appropriate candidates for surgical consultation. The purpose of this study was to compare the no show and surgical progression rates between online-scheduled and traditionally scheduled outpatient visits in our practice.
Objective:
Our primary hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the rate of progression to surgery within three months after the initial ‘new visit’ between online-scheduling and traditionally scheduling services. The secondary hypothesis was that there was no significant difference in the no-show rate between the two scheduling services.
Methods:
All outpatient visits at a single large multispecialty orthopedic practice from 2/1/2022 through 2/28/2022 were collected. Scheduled visits were identified as either “online -scheduled” indicating patients scheduled their own visit through the new web-based patient portal system, or “traditionally scheduled,” indicating that the visit was scheduled with office staff. All visits were further categorized as either a “new visit” or a “follow-up visit.” Surgical records were reviewed to identify patients that underwent surgery within three months of their scheduled office visits.
Results:
Within the one-month timeframe, there were 71,673 traditionally scheduled visits and 3,058 patient scheduled visits. The rate of progression to surgery within three months after the new visit showed a significant difference (18% of online-scheduled vs. 21% of traditionally scheduled new visits; P=0.036). There was no difference in no-show rates between the two scheduling groups (4.5% of online-scheduled vs. 4.4% of traditionally scheduled visits; P=0.79). Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in no-show rate when comparing new patients and follow-up visits separately.
Conclusions:
Online-scheduling systems allow for greater patient autonomy and access to care, while reducing the administrative burden of office staff. A small but significant difference in the surgery rate with the traditional scheduling might be explained by the fact that the older generation still has more confidence in phone call scheduling than in using electronic applications. Moreover, the new office visits following urgent care referrals can be squeezed more rapidly into the schedule via the traditional scheduling because it is impossible to haggle with the system.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.