Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 22, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 22, 2022 - Nov 17, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 13, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient-Reported Outcomes Collection at an Urban HIV Clinic Associated With a Historically Black Medical College in the Southern United States: Qualitative Interview Study Among Patients With HIV

Parisot PE III, Wheeler F, Bonnet K, Rebeiro PF, Schember CO, McCainster K, Cooper RL, Berthaud V, Schlundt DG, Pettit AC

Patient-Reported Outcomes Collection at an Urban HIV Clinic Associated With a Historically Black Medical College in the Southern United States: Qualitative Interview Study Among Patients With HIV

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e42888

DOI: 10.2196/42888

PMID: 36947109

PMCID: 10132038

Patient Reported Outcomes Collection at an urban HIV Clinic associated with a Historically Black Medical College in the Southern United States: A Qualitative Study

  • Paul E. Parisot III; 
  • Facerlyn Wheeler; 
  • Kemberlee Bonnet; 
  • Peter F. Rebeiro; 
  • Cassandra O. Schember; 
  • Korlu McCainster; 
  • Robert L. Cooper; 
  • Vladimir Berthaud; 
  • David G. Schlundt; 
  • April C. Pettit

ABSTRACT

Background:

Black Americans, particularly in the South, are disproportionately affected by the United States (US) HIV epidemic. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data collection can provide oft-overlooked data on social and behavioral determinants of health.

Objective:

We piloted PRO data collection using an electronic tablet among people with HIV (PWH) in care at an HIV clinic affiliated with a Historically Black Medical College in Nashville, Tennessee.

Methods:

Participants completed PRO questionnaires on a hand-held tablet. We interviewed 20 of these participants to learn more about their questionnaire experience. Interview guide development was grounded in the Cognitive Behavioral Model in which thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are interrelated. Data coding, analysis, and reporting followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.

Results:

Among 100 PWH enrolled, the median age was 50 years, 89% were Black, and 60% were male. Five major interview themes emerged: Overall Experience, Question Content, Sensitive Topics, Clinic Visit Impact, and Future Recommendations. Interview participants felt the tablet was easy to use and that question content was meaningful. PRO questions elicited discomfort in some, but most desired to be truthful and would complete PRO questions at future visits.

Conclusions:

The use of an electronic tablet to complete PRO questionnaires was well-received by this cohort of vulnerable PWH in the US South. Despite some discomfort, our cohort believed this was a valuable part of their medical experience. Future research should focus on scaling up the implementation and evaluation of PRO data collection in a contextually appropriate manner.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Parisot PE III, Wheeler F, Bonnet K, Rebeiro PF, Schember CO, McCainster K, Cooper RL, Berthaud V, Schlundt DG, Pettit AC

Patient-Reported Outcomes Collection at an Urban HIV Clinic Associated With a Historically Black Medical College in the Southern United States: Qualitative Interview Study Among Patients With HIV

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e42888

DOI: 10.2196/42888

PMID: 36947109

PMCID: 10132038

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.