Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 23, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 23, 2022 - Nov 18, 2022
Date Accepted: Nov 14, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Reasons That Lead People to End Up Buying Fake Medicines on the Internet: Qualitative Interview Study

Almomani H, Patel N, Donyai P

Reasons That Lead People to End Up Buying Fake Medicines on the Internet: Qualitative Interview Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e42887

DOI: 10.2196/42887

PMID: 36795460

PMCID: 9982721

Reasons That Lead People to End Up Buying Fake Medicines Online: A Qualitative Interview Study

  • Hamzeh Almomani; 
  • Nilesh Patel; 
  • Parastou Donyai

ABSTRACT

Background:

Many people in the UK are turning to the internet to obtain their medicines. This introduces a significant public health risk and patient safety concerns as the Internet is a potential source of fake medicines.

Objective:

This qualitative study aimed to identify the reasons why people in the UK purchase medicines from the internet, which in turn could lead them to buy fake medicines inadvertently. The focus was on prescription only medicines (POMs) and those medicines that have the potential to be misused or that require a higher level of medical oversight during the purchase. This study also explored UK consumers’ perception of the risks posed by fake medicines available online.

Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults based in the UK who had previously purchased medicines online. The recruitment was continued until no new themes were identified (data saturation was reached). The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) was employed to interpret their views, and interview transcripts analysed using thematic analysis. The University’s research ethics committee approval was obtained.

Results:

Twenty interviews were conducted. Participants had bought various types of POMs or medicines with potential to be misused or that required a higher level of medical oversight (e.g., HRT, antibiotics, and high-risk controlled medicines). Participants demonstrated awareness of the presence of fake medicines on the internet, and they understood risks associated with them. The factors that influence consumers decision to buy medicines online were identified and grouped into themes including advantages and disadvantages of purchasing medicines in this way, the social influencing factors, the barriers and facilitators of the purchase as well as factors that lead consumers to trust the online sellers of medicines.

Conclusions:

This study provides deep insight into the breadth of reasons that drive consumers to buy medicines online. Identifying these reasons could enable the development of effective public awareness campaigns that warn consumers about the risks of buying fake medicines from online source. The findings could also help researchers to design interventions to prevent people from buying POMs online in general, thus preventing the purchasing of fake medicines.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Almomani H, Patel N, Donyai P

Reasons That Lead People to End Up Buying Fake Medicines on the Internet: Qualitative Interview Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e42887

DOI: 10.2196/42887

PMID: 36795460

PMCID: 9982721

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.