Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Sep 12, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 12, 2022 - Sep 27, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 4, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing the Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Acceptability of Heated Tobacco Products and Refillable Electronic Cigarettes for Cigarette Substitution (CEASEFIRE): Randomized Controlled Trial

Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Maglia M, Benfatto F, Emma R, Caruso M, Caci G, Busà B, Pennisi A, Ceracchi M, Migliore M, Signorelli M

Comparing the Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Acceptability of Heated Tobacco Products and Refillable Electronic Cigarettes for Cigarette Substitution (CEASEFIRE): Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e42628

DOI: 10.2196/42628

PMID: 37014673

PMCID: 10131829

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A randomized controlled trial Comparing Effectiveness, tolerability, and Acceptability of Heated Tobacco ProductS vs. refillable Electronic cigarettes For cIgaREttes substitution: CEASEFIRE study.

  • Pasquale Caponnetto; 
  • Davide Campagna; 
  • Marilena Maglia; 
  • Francesca Benfatto; 
  • Rosalia Emma; 
  • Massimo Caruso; 
  • Grazia Caci; 
  • Barbara Busà; 
  • Alfio Pennisi; 
  • Maurizio Ceracchi; 
  • Marcello Migliore; 
  • Maria Signorelli

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic cigarettes (ECs) and heated tobacco products (HTPs)are increasingly used to quit smoking. We conducted the first randomized controlled trial comparing quit rates between HTPs and ECs in smokers not intending to quit

Objective:

Compare effectiveness, tolerability, and product satisfaction between HTPs (IQOS 2.4) and refillable ECs (JustFog Q16) in smokers not intending to quit. Cessation intervention included motivational counseling. The primary

Methods:

A 12-week randomized non-inferiority switching trial to compare effectiveness, tolerability, and product satisfaction between HTPs (IQOS 2.4) and refillable ECs (JustFog Q16) in smokers not intending to quit. Cessation intervention included motivational counseling. The primary endpoint of the study was carbon monoxide confirmed continuous abstinence rate from week 4 to week 12 (CAR 4-12). Secondary endpoints included: continuous reduction rate from week 4 to week 12 (CRR 4-12), and 7-day point prevalence of smoking abstinence or reduction.

Results:

A total of 211 participants completed the study. High quit rates (CAR 4-12) of 39.1% and 30.8% were observed for IQOS-HTP and JustFog-EC, respectively. Between-group difference for CAR 4-12 was not significant (P = 0.2028). CRR 4-12 for IQOS-HTP and JustFog-EC were 46.4% and 39.3%, respectively; between-group difference was not significant (P = 0.2358). At week 12, 7-day point prevalence of smoking abstinence for IQOS-HTP and JustFog-EC were 40.2% and 41.1%, respectively. The most frequent adverse events were cough and reduced physical fitness. Appreciation was satisfactory for both study products.

Conclusions:

Switching to HTPs elicited marked reduction in cigarette consumption in smokers not intending to quit, which was comparable to refillable ECs. HTPs may be a useful addition to the arsenal of reduced risk alternatives for tobacco cigarettes and may contribute to smoking cessation. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03569748. Registered June 25, 2018. https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/LoginUser?ts¼1&cx¼-jg9qo4.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Maglia M, Benfatto F, Emma R, Caruso M, Caci G, Busà B, Pennisi A, Ceracchi M, Migliore M, Signorelli M

Comparing the Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Acceptability of Heated Tobacco Products and Refillable Electronic Cigarettes for Cigarette Substitution (CEASEFIRE): Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e42628

DOI: 10.2196/42628

PMID: 37014673

PMCID: 10131829

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.