Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 7, 2022
Date Accepted: Sep 25, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing Web-Based and Blended Training for Coping With Challenges of Flexible Work Designs: Randomized Controlled Trial

Althammer SE, Wöhrmann AM, Michel A

Comparing Web-Based and Blended Training for Coping With Challenges of Flexible Work Designs: Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e42510

DOI: 10.2196/42510

PMID: 38113084

PMCID: 10762610

Web-Based and Blended Training: Same Same but Different? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Training Formats to Meet the Challenges of Flexible Work Designs

  • Sarah Elena Althammer; 
  • Anne Marit Wöhrmann; 
  • Alexandra Michel

ABSTRACT

Background:

Workers with flexible work designs (FWD) face specific challenges such as difficulties to detach from work, to set boundaries between work and private life, and to recover.

Objective:

This study evaluates the effectiveness of an intervention to improve recovery, work-life balance, and well-being of workers with FWD compared to a waitlist control group. It also compares the effectiveness of a web-based training format and a blended training format.

Methods:

In the web-based training format, participants individually completed six web-based modules and daily tasks over six weeks, learning self-regulation strategies to meet the particular challenges of FWD. In the blended training format, participants attended three group sessions in addition to the six web-based modules. In a randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned to a web-based intervention group (n = 196), to a blended intervention group (n = 198), or to a waitlist control group (n = 181). Study participants self-assessed their levels of primary outcomes (psychological detachment, satisfaction with work-life balance, and well-being) before the intervention as well as after the intervention, and at a four-week and six-month follow-up. The final sample included 373 participants (web-based intervention group: n = 107; blended intervention group: n = 129; control group: n = 137). Compliance was assessed as a secondary outcome.

Results:

Results of multilevel analyses were in line with our predictions that both training formats would improve psychological detachment, satisfaction with work-life balance, and well-being. We expected blended training to reinforce these effects, but blended training participants did not profit more from the intervention than web-based training participants. However, they reported to have had more social exchange, and blended training participants were more likely to adhere to the training.

Conclusions:

Thus, both the web-based and the blended training are effective tools to improve recovery, work-life balance, and well-being of workers with FWD. Group sessions can increase the likelihood that participants actively participate in web-based modules and exercises. Clinical Trial: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00032721; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00032721 (retrospectively registered)


 Citation

Please cite as:

Althammer SE, Wöhrmann AM, Michel A

Comparing Web-Based and Blended Training for Coping With Challenges of Flexible Work Designs: Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e42510

DOI: 10.2196/42510

PMID: 38113084

PMCID: 10762610

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.