Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 1, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 1, 2022 - Oct 27, 2022
Date Accepted: Nov 15, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Accuracy and Systematic Biases of Heart Rate Measurements by Consumer-Grade Fitness Trackers in Postoperative Patients: Prospective Clinical Trial

Helmer P, Hottenrott S, Rodemers P, Leppich R, Helwich M, Pryss R, Kranke P, Meybohm P, Winkler BE, Sammeth M

Accuracy and Systematic Biases of Heart Rate Measurements by Consumer-Grade Fitness Trackers in Postoperative Patients: Prospective Clinical Trial

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(12):e42359

DOI: 10.2196/42359

PMID: 36583938

PMCID: 9840097

Accuracy and Systematic Biases of Heart Rate Measurements by Consumer-Grade Fitness Trackers in Postoperative Patients: Prospective Clinical Trial

  • Philipp Helmer; 
  • Sebastian Hottenrott; 
  • Philipp Rodemers; 
  • Robert Leppich; 
  • Maja Helwich; 
  • Rüdiger Pryss; 
  • Peter Kranke; 
  • Patrick Meybohm; 
  • Bernd E Winkler; 
  • Michael Sammeth

Background:

Over the recent years, technological advances of wrist-worn fitness trackers heralded a new era in the continuous monitoring of vital signs. So far, these devices have primarily been used for sports.

Objective:

However, for using these technologies in health care, further validations of the measurement accuracy in hospitalized patients are essential but lacking to date.

Methods:

We conducted a prospective validation study with 201 patients after moderate to major surgery in a controlled setting to benchmark the accuracy of heart rate measurements in 4 consumer-grade fitness trackers (Apple Watch 7, Garmin Fenix 6 Pro, Withings ScanWatch, and Fitbit Sense) against the clinical gold standard (electrocardiography).

Results:

All devices exhibited high correlation (r≥0.95; P<.001) and concordance (rc≥0.94) coefficients, with a relative error as low as mean absolute percentage error <5% based on 1630 valid measurements. We identified confounders significantly biasing the measurement accuracy, although not at clinically relevant levels (mean absolute error<5 beats per minute).

Conclusions:

Consumer-grade fitness trackers appear promising in hospitalized patients for monitoring heart rate.

ClinicalTrial:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05418881; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05418881


 Citation

Please cite as:

Helmer P, Hottenrott S, Rodemers P, Leppich R, Helwich M, Pryss R, Kranke P, Meybohm P, Winkler BE, Sammeth M

Accuracy and Systematic Biases of Heart Rate Measurements by Consumer-Grade Fitness Trackers in Postoperative Patients: Prospective Clinical Trial

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(12):e42359

DOI: 10.2196/42359

PMID: 36583938

PMCID: 9840097

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.