Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Aug 27, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 27, 2022 - Oct 22, 2022
Date Accepted: Nov 28, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Persian Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS-FA): Development and Validation Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
There are 110 million Farsi speakers worldwide who have access to a growing mobile app market. Despite restrictions and international sanctions, the internal mHealth app market in Iran is growing, especially for Android-based apps. However, there are no guidelines for developing health apps that meet international quality standards. There are also no tools in Farsi that assess health app quality. Developers and researchers who operate in Farsi could benefit from such quality assessment tools to improve their outputs.
Objective:
This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the Mobile App Rating Scale in Farsi (MARS-Fa). This study also evaluated the validity and reliability of the newly developed MARS-Fa tool.
Methods:
We used a well-established method to translate and back-translate the MARS-Fa tool with a group of Iranian and international experts in Health Information Technology and Psychology. We validated the MARS-Fa with a sample of 92 apps addressing smartphone addiction using two trained reviewers. We reported inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity of the validation exercise.
Results:
Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was .84 for the total MARS-Fa and subjective quality, indicating excellent internal consistency. Spearman-Brown split-half reliability indicators were very good and excellent (.79 to .93). The MARS-Fa showed excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC=.91) and test-retest reliability (r=.94). The inter-item correlation coefficients among 18 items were greater than 0.20, suggesting good construct and discriminant validity.
Conclusions:
The MARS-Fa tool can be reliably used to evaluate health apps by trained reviewers who speak Farsi. Further research should be done to validate the tool with health apps targeting other health problems.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.