Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Aug 24, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 23, 2022 - Oct 18, 2022
Date Accepted: Jan 29, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Implementation science perspectives on implementing telemedicine interventions for hypertension or diabetes management: A scoping review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Hypertension and diabetes are increasingly prevalent around the world. Telemedicine is an accessible and cost-effective means of supporting hypertension and diabetes management, especially as the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of technological solutions to care. However, to date, no review has examined the contextual factors that influence the implementation of telemedicine interventions for hypertension and/or diabetes globally.
Objective:
We adopted a comprehensive implementation research perspective to synthesize the barriers and facilitators to implementing telemedicine interventions for hypertension and/or diabetes management.
Methods:
We performed a scoping review, involving searches in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, to identify studies published in English from 2017 to 2022 describing barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of telemedicine interventions for hypertension and diabetes management. The coding and synthesis of barriers and facilitators were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Results:
Of the 17685 records identified, 35 studies were included in our scoping review. We found that facilitators and barriers to implementation were dispersed across the constructs in the CFIR framework. Barriers related to cost, patient needs and resources (e.g., lack of consideration of language needs, culture, rural residency), personal attributes of patients (e.g., demographics and priorities) were most common. Facilitators related to the design and packaging of the intervention (e.g., user-friendliness), patient needs and resources (e.g., personalized information that leveraged existing strengths), implementation climate (e.g., intervention embedded into existing infrastructure), knowledge and beliefs about the intervention (e.g., convenience of telemedicine), and other personal attributes (e.g., technical literacy) were most common.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that successful implementation of telemedicine interventions for hypertension and diabetes requires comprehensive efforts at the planning, executing, engaging, and reflecting and evaluating stages of intervention implementation in order to address challenges at the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and environmental levels.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.