Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Aug 23, 2022
Date Accepted: Dec 16, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Spatiotemporal Trends in Self-Reported Mask-Wearing Behavior in the United States: Analysis of a Large Cross-sectional Survey

Taube JC, Susswein Z, Bansal S

Spatiotemporal Trends in Self-Reported Mask-Wearing Behavior in the United States: Analysis of a Large Cross-sectional Survey

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e42128

DOI: 10.2196/42128

PMID: 36877548

PMCID: 10028521

Spatiotemporal trends in self-reported mask-wearing behavior in the United States: Analysis of a large cross-sectional survey

  • Juliana C. Taube; 
  • Zachary Susswein; 
  • Shweta Bansal

ABSTRACT

Background:

Mask-wearing has likely played a role in the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. While numerous studies have investigated demographic predictors of masking behavior nationally, most suffer from survey biases and none have characterized mask-wearing at fine spatial scales through different phases of the pandemic.

Objective:

Urgently needed is a debiased spatiotemporal characterization of mask-wearing behavior, information critical for assessing the effectiveness of masking, forecasting disease surges, and guiding public health decision-making.

Methods:

We analyze spatiotemporal masking patterns in 8+ million behavioral survey responses from across the United States from September 2020 to May 2021. We adjust for sample size and representation using binomial regression models and survey raking to produce county-level monthly estimates of masking behavior. We additionally debias self-reported masking estimates using bias measures derived by comparing vaccination data from the same survey to official records. Lastly, we evaluate whether individuals' perceptions of their social environment can serve as a less biased form of behavioral surveillance than self-reported data.

Results:

We find that county-level masking behavior is spatially heterogeneous along an urban-rural gradient, with mask-wearing peaking in winter 2021 and declining sharply through May 2021. Our results identify regions where targeted public health efforts could have been most effective and suggest that individuals’ frequency of mask-wearing may be influenced by national guidance and disease prevalence. Self-reported behavior estimates are especially prone to social desirability and non-response biases; our findings demonstrate that these biases can be reduced if individuals are asked to report on community rather than self behaviors.

Conclusions:

Our work highlights the need to characterize public health behaviors at fine spatiotemporal scales to capture heterogeneities that drive outbreak trajectories, as well as the role of behavioral big data to inform public health efforts. We advocate for a social sensing approach to behavioral surveillance to enable more accurate estimates of public health behaviors.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Taube JC, Susswein Z, Bansal S

Spatiotemporal Trends in Self-Reported Mask-Wearing Behavior in the United States: Analysis of a Large Cross-sectional Survey

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e42128

DOI: 10.2196/42128

PMID: 36877548

PMCID: 10028521

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.