Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Aug 22, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 26, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake of mHealth Apps in Cancer Care Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Scoping Literature Review

Ardito V, Golubev G, Ciani O, Tarricone R

Evaluating Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake of mHealth Apps in Cancer Care Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Scoping Literature Review

JMIR Cancer 2023;9:e42092

DOI: 10.2196/42092

PMID: 36995750

PMCID: 10131717

Evaluating barriers and facilitators to the uptake of mHealth apps in cancer care using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): A scoping literature review

  • Vittoria Ardito; 
  • Georgi Golubev; 
  • Oriana Ciani; 
  • Rosanna Tarricone

ABSTRACT

Background:

mHealth importance has been growing over time due to recent demographic and epidemiological trends and the rise of chronic conditions, enhanced smartphone hardware and software functionalities, and the need to contain healthcare spending. Yet, even when beneficial to improve patient outcomes, sustained mHealth app usage is not necessarily observed in clinical practice.

Objective:

This work aims at investigating barriers and enablers to continuous uptake of mHealth solutions to support the treatment stage within the continuum of cancer care.

Methods:

A scoping literature review has been conducted on MedLine and Web of Science databases in March 2022. Studies analyzing mHealth solutions for cancer patients under ongoing treatments were searched. Experimental study designs including RCTs, and observational studies were considered. Data on study characteristics, patient population, app functionalities, study outcomes, and implementation barriers and enablers were extracted. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as a practical tool to guide data collection and analysis. Evidence was synthetized mostly with a narrative format.

Results:

Overall, 89 papers were included for data synthesis. Almost half of the studies (N=41, 46.1%) were published in Europe. The most frequent study design is RCT (N=26, 29.2%), but overall single-arm non-comparative studies (N=50, 56.2%) prevail. As for implementation barriers and enablers assessed using the CFIR, on one hand, involvement of several stakeholders in the app co-design, small scales pilot testing, and social endorsement by key opinion leaders are amongst the most relevant facilitators. On the other hand, individuals’ perceptions of smartphone use in certain social contexts (e.g., at work), a weak sense of identification with health service providers or the lack of interoperability with hospital IT systems are the most recurrent barriers.

Conclusions:

The hype surrounding mHealth diffusion is hindered by a number of barriers and facilitators that affect its implementation in the continuum of cancer care. These elements should be systematically considered in the attempt to close the “research-do gap” between what works in principle and what is used in clinical practice, hopefully leading to a sustained use of mHealth in real life. Clinical Trial: None.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ardito V, Golubev G, Ciani O, Tarricone R

Evaluating Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake of mHealth Apps in Cancer Care Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Scoping Literature Review

JMIR Cancer 2023;9:e42092

DOI: 10.2196/42092

PMID: 36995750

PMCID: 10131717

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.