Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Aug 16, 2022
Date Accepted: Jun 19, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jun 28, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effects of Prosocial and Hope-Promoting Communication Strategies on COVID-19 Worry and Intentions for Risk-Reducing Behaviors and Vaccination: Experimental Study

Scharnetzki E, Waterston L, Scherer AM, Thorpe A, Fagerlin A, Han PK

Effects of Prosocial and Hope-Promoting Communication Strategies on COVID-19 Worry and Intentions for Risk-Reducing Behaviors and Vaccination: Experimental Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e41959

DOI: 10.2196/41959

PMID: 37379364

PMCID: 10411423

Effects of pro-social and hope-promoting communication strategies on COVID-19 worry and intentions for risk-reducing behaviors and vaccination: An experimental study

  • Elizabeth Scharnetzki; 
  • Leo Waterston; 
  • Aaron M Scherer; 
  • Alistair Thorpe; 
  • Angela Fagerlin; 
  • Paul KJ Han

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic has engendered widespread fear and skepticism about recommended risk-reducing behaviors including vaccination. Health agencies have attempted to counter these negative effects with communication strategies that promote pro-social values and hope. However, there is little empirical evidence on the comparative effectiveness of these strategies.

Objective:

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of pro-social and hope-promoting messages in reassuring the public and motivating COVID-19 risk-reducing behaviors.

Methods:

An online factorial experiment was conducted in which a diverse sample of the US public was randomized to read COVID-19 informational messages containing alternative framing language: pro-social (PS), hope-promoting (HP), or no additional framing (Control). Participants then completed surveys measuring COVID-19 worry and intentions for COVID-19 risk-reducing intentions and vaccination.

Results:

COVID-19 worry was unexpectedly higher in the HP than in the Control and PS conditions. Intentions for COVID-19 risk-reducing behaviors did not differ between groups; however, intentions for COVID-19 vaccination were higher in the HP than in the Control condition, and this effect was mediated by COVID-19 worry.

Conclusions:

It appears that hope-promoting communication strategies may be more effective than Pro-social strategies in motivating risk-reducing behaviors, in some contexts, but with the paradoxical cost of promoting worry.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Scharnetzki E, Waterston L, Scherer AM, Thorpe A, Fagerlin A, Han PK

Effects of Prosocial and Hope-Promoting Communication Strategies on COVID-19 Worry and Intentions for Risk-Reducing Behaviors and Vaccination: Experimental Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e41959

DOI: 10.2196/41959

PMID: 37379364

PMCID: 10411423

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.