Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 11, 2022
Date Accepted: May 2, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Smartwatch-Detected Arrhythmias in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Analysis of the SMART TAVR Trial

Fan J, Dai H, Guo Y, Xu J, Wang L, Jiang J, Lin X, Li C, Zhou D, Li H, Liu X, Wang J

Smartwatch-Detected Arrhythmias in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Analysis of the SMART TAVR Trial

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e41843

DOI: 10.2196/41843

PMID: 39028996

PMCID: 11297386

Smartwatch Detected Arrhythmias in Patients after TAVR: Arrhythmias Analysis of the SMART TAVR Trial

  • Jiaqi Fan; 
  • Hanyi Dai; 
  • Yuchao Guo; 
  • Jianguo Xu; 
  • Lihan Wang; 
  • Jubo Jiang; 
  • Xinping Lin; 
  • Cheng Li; 
  • Dao Zhou; 
  • Huajun Li; 
  • Xianbao Liu; 
  • Jianan Wang

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is little data available on the development of arrhythmias in patients at risk of high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) or complete heart block (CHB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Objective:

This study sought to explore the incidence and evolution of arrhythmias by monitoring patients with HAVB or CHB risk after TAVR with smartwatch.

Methods:

We analyzed 188 consecutive patients in the prospective SMART TAVR trial. Patients were divided into two groups according to the risk of HAVB or CHB. The incidence and time of arrhythmias and pacemaker implantation within a 30-day follow-up were compared. All arrhythmic events were adjudicated in a central ECG core lab.

Results:

The mean age of the patients was 73.1±7.3 years, of whom 55.9% were men. The mean discharging day after TAVR was 2.0±1.8 days. The patients at higher risk of HAVB or CHB received more pacemaker implantation after discharge (9.6% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.043). The incidence of left bundle branch block was higher in the higher HAVB or CHB risk group (56.3% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.001). The independent predictors for pacemaker implantation were age, baseline atrial fibrillation, baseline RBBB, Mobitz II, and third-degree AVB detected by smartwatch.

Conclusions:

A higher incidence of pacemaker implantation after discharge was observed in patients at a risk of HAVB or CHB. However, the Mobitz II and third-degree AVB detected by smartwatch during follow-up were more valuable indicators to predict pacemaker implantation after discharge from the index TAVR. Clinical Trial: SMART Watch Facilitated Early Discharge in Patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [SMART TAVR study]: NCT04454177


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fan J, Dai H, Guo Y, Xu J, Wang L, Jiang J, Lin X, Li C, Zhou D, Li H, Liu X, Wang J

Smartwatch-Detected Arrhythmias in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Analysis of the SMART TAVR Trial

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e41843

DOI: 10.2196/41843

PMID: 39028996

PMCID: 11297386

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.