Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Aug 6, 2022
Date Accepted: Jan 17, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Nurse-Physician Relationship During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Shanghai, China: Cross-sectional Study

Shi Y, Gu P, Wang Q, Zhang X

The Nurse-Physician Relationship During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Shanghai, China: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e41729

DOI: 10.2196/41729

PMID: 36745499

PMCID: 9907571

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The Nurse-Physician Relationship during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Shanghai, China: A cross-sectional study

  • Yueping Shi; 
  • Pinhua Gu; 
  • Qiufeng Wang; 
  • Xuelian Zhang

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic has put unprecedented pressure on the healthcare system and has placed greater demands on nurse-physician collaboration. Nurses and physicians often struggle to share mutual responsibility and communicate effectively.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of nurses and physicians during the pandemic and construct a new model combining the attitude and behaviors of the two groups to assess various factors' impacts on job satisfaction and confrontational behavior.

Methods:

We conducted this quantitative cross-sectional study to assess the relationship between nurses and physicians based on the attitudes and behaviors toward nurse-physician collaboration. We used an adapted and modified Jefferson Scale of Attitudes toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration (JSAPNC) questionnaire that added consisted of 17 items under 5 dimensions. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to assess the relationships between domains. Ordinal logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between different domains of the questionnaire and the satisfaction of the current nurse-physician relationship.

Results:

We included a total of 176 nurses and 124 physicians in this study. The two groups both agreed that the nurse-physician relationship had become better because of the COVID-19 pandemic (p=.09) and that the public had greater respect for medical staff (p=.57). Significantly more nurses (33.5% agreed vs. 63.7% agreed, p<.001) thought physicians and nurses were not treated with the same respect. Nurses scored significantly higher scores in caring vs. curing (16.27 ±2.88 vs. 17.43 ±2.50) and physician’s authority (8.72 ±3.21 vs. 7.24±3.32) compared with physicians. There was no statistical difference between the other sub-scales and the overall score. The shared education & collaboration had a significantly positive relationship with the nurse’s autonomy (Standardized coefficient, 0.98, p<.001).

Conclusions:

This study showed that nurses were more unsatisfied with the current nurse-physician relationship than physicians. Positive attitudes and behaviors towards shared collaboration and responsibility could help to improve the relationship between the two groups.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shi Y, Gu P, Wang Q, Zhang X

The Nurse-Physician Relationship During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Shanghai, China: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e41729

DOI: 10.2196/41729

PMID: 36745499

PMCID: 9907571

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.