Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 5, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 27, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examination of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of the Online Personalised Training in Memory Strategies for Everyday Program for Older Adults: Single-Arm Pre-Post Trial

Pike K, Moller CI, Bryant C, Farrow M, Dao DP, Ellis KA

Examination of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of the Online Personalised Training in Memory Strategies for Everyday Program for Older Adults: Single-Arm Pre-Post Trial

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e41712

DOI: 10.2196/41712

PMID: 37079356

PMCID: 10160943

Examination of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of the Online Personalised Training in Memory Strategies for Everyday (OPTIMiSE) Program for Older Adults: Results from a Single-Arm Pre-Post Trial

  • Kerryn Pike; 
  • Carl I. Moller; 
  • Christina Bryant; 
  • Maree Farrow; 
  • Duy P. Dao; 
  • Kathryn A. Ellis

ABSTRACT

Background:

Memory strategy training for older adults helps maintain and improve cognitive health, but is traditionally offered face-to-face, which is resource-intensive, limits accessibility, and challenging during a pandemic. Online interventions, such as the Online Personalised Training in Memory Strategies for Everyday (OPTIMiSE) program, may overcome such barriers.

Objective:

We report on OPTIMiSE’s feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy.

Methods:

Australians ≥60 years, reporting subjective cognitive decline, participated in this single-arm pre-post online intervention followed by a 3-month booster. We examined feasibility (recruitment, attrition, data collection), acceptability (recommendation to others), and efficacy (goals, strategy knowledge and use, self-reported memory, memory satisfaction and knowledge, mood).

Results:

Results:

OPTIMiSE was feasible, as demonstrated by strong interest (633 screened) and satisfactory level of attrition (51%). It was acceptable, with 97% agreeing they would recommend OPTIMiSE. It was efficacious: linear mixed-effects analyses revealed improvement across all primary outcome measures, with effect sizes in the moderate to large range [(d = post-course; 3 month booster; all P < .001): memory goal satisfaction (d = 1.24; 1.64), strategy knowledge (d = 0.67,0.72) and use (d = 0.79, 0.90), self-reported memory (d = 0.80; 0.83), memory satisfaction (d = 1.25; 1.29) and knowledge (d = 0.96, 0.26), mood (post course d = -0.35, non-significant at booster).

Conclusions:

This feasible, acceptable, and efficacious online intervention has the potential to enable access to an evidence-based memory intervention for older adults worldwide. This is particularly important for supporting the growing number of older adults living with cognitive concerns. Clinical Trial: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12620000979954


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pike K, Moller CI, Bryant C, Farrow M, Dao DP, Ellis KA

Examination of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of the Online Personalised Training in Memory Strategies for Everyday Program for Older Adults: Single-Arm Pre-Post Trial

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e41712

DOI: 10.2196/41712

PMID: 37079356

PMCID: 10160943

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.